Live data from Hacker News

No more O'Reilly subscriptions for me

zerokspot.com

51–60 of 180 posts

Re: No more O'Reilly subscriptions for me

#51
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It went un-noticed here, I think, but The Pragmatic Bookshelf recently fired most of its staff and are taking on no new books. In the email they sent to authors, they quoted a 40% YoY fall in non-fiction sales, industry-wide.

Honestly, I wonder how some of these publishers stay in business at all. I haven't written a book, but I've been a technical reviewer for friends who have been published with some of the larger technical publishers. Nobody was making money from the process. I do wonder if maybe they're just taking on too many titles and reaching saturation. Do we really need "The guide to making X on Y with Z" for every potential ite…

> Nobody was making money from the process.

From the people I know who wrote or co-wrote books, the way you make money is in future interview processes.

I don't know if they still do it, but when I interviewed for Google, they had a self-ranking system of how competent you are in each technology, and the only way to get the top score was phrased something like "I wrote the book on it (yes, an actual book)".

Re: No more O'Reilly subscriptions for me

#52
The moment O'Reilly went subscription-only they lost me as a customer. I have a huge library of O'Reilly books I've purchased as PDFs. Shit I've got a huge library of print O'Reilly books despite years of slimming down.

It really sucked because I've been learning from O'Reilly books for thirty years. But I've become fundamentally opposed to DRM on media and subscription-only access is the ultimate DRM. I don't have any desire to be locked into their app to access stuff I paid for and be at the whims of their poor UI decisions.

Re: No more O'Reilly subscriptions for me

#53
post #33
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this because people seek knowledge from LLMs rather than from books now? Or is it because LLMs know everything that is in books, so people don't feel compelled to learn any more themselves?

loaded questions.

Maybe a bit depressing, but I'm not sure loaded. I was just talking to someone (in person!) a few days ago, who purported that online courses were basically dead, because people can learn from LLMs instead.

And then, it seems to be a real issue amongst some people to ask, "why should I learn X, when LLMs already know it?" Not unlike, "why should I learn to divide, when we have calculators?" but on a grander scale.

Re: No more O'Reilly subscriptions for me

#54
I had the option to get a membership that I could expense through my work, but decided against it after the trial period ended.

The reason was entirely the terrible state of their app.

- Random crashes, or times when it would not start up at all.

- Text to speech is unusable because it cannot start reading at a specific point. Only at the beginning.

- Cannot download epub to use with a different (better) epub reader.

So even though it would not cost me anything, I realized I would never use it due to the issues with their app.

Re: No more O'Reilly subscriptions for me

#55
post #20

At one time I worked at a research institute. It had a huge library that was only partially filled. One of the directors wanted to buy every developer their own Safari subscription. The cost was quoted at around $4K/mo IIRC. I pointed out that it would be far more cost–effective to simple let us request hard copies of whatever books we wanted, and then they would just stay in the library. No one worked remotely at th…

It’s capex vs. opex. A large enough company has a fixed budget for both, and for your situation, I assume that the opex budget had the funds, while the capex did not.

Maybe it's just some peculiarity I'm missing, but wouldn't a smaller capex sum be a pareto improvement over a larger opex? Is there any way in which denying the suggestion was rational?

Re: No more O'Reilly subscriptions for me

#56
post #7

I just checked, and I've had an O'Reilly account since March of 2014 without major interruption, back when it was called Safari. It is by far the best source for high quality tech content out there. There is so much filler content in tech blogs, that I'm happy to pay to get access to high quality. I must be on some grandfathered plan though, as I'm not paying near $500/year. That is a very steep price.

What are you paying?

As another data point, I'm on an old plan for $199/year.

Re: No more O'Reilly subscriptions for me

#57
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think this was supposed to be public knowledge.

Out of an abundance of caution, I've deleted it. So there we are.

> Out of an abundance of caution, I've deleted it. So there we are.

Out of an abundance of curiosity, I discovered an archive of your comment, which I didn’t myself make, but I link here for purposes of discussion:

https://archive.is/C3gAc

Re: No more O'Reilly subscriptions for me

#58

The moment O'Reilly went subscription-only they lost me as a customer. I have a huge library of O'Reilly books I've purchased as PDFs. Shit I've got a huge library of print O'Reilly books despite years of slimming down. It really sucked because I've been learning from O'Reilly books for thirty years. But I've become fundamentally opposed to DRM on media and subscription-only access is the ultimate DRM. I don't have a…

They do still sell all of their books - just not directly on their website.

Whenever possible, they're sold without DRM.

Re: No more O'Reilly subscriptions for me

#59
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s capex vs. opex. A large enough company has a fixed budget for both, and for your situation, I assume that the opex budget had the funds, while the capex did not.

Maybe it's just some peculiarity I'm missing, but wouldn't a smaller capex sum be a pareto improvement over a larger opex? Is there any way in which denying the suggestion was rational?

Yes, spending less money is better than spending more money (though there can be potential tax treatment differences or other complexities depending on exactly how money is spent), but that doesn't mean the person in charge of approving an employee's expense is authorized to approve expenses however they please. If they're given a budget that says they get X money in one category and Y money in another, they can't spend (X-2Z, Y+Z) and can only choose to spend (X,Y) or deny the request. Big organizations often have a lot of inefficiencies due to process.

Re: No more O'Reilly subscriptions for me

#60
post #7

I just checked, and I've had an O'Reilly account since March of 2014 without major interruption, back when it was called Safari. It is by far the best source for high quality tech content out there. There is so much filler content in tech blogs, that I'm happy to pay to get access to high quality. I must be on some grandfathered plan though, as I'm not paying near $500/year. That is a very steep price.

What are you paying?

$199/year. I think it is worth that, but I don't think I'd pay much more.
Post reply on HN