51–60 of 183 posts
> I saw from the SSD was around 800 MB/s (which doesn’t really make sense as that should give execution speeds at 40+ seconds, but computers are magical so who knows what is going on). If anyone knows what’s actually going on, please do tell.
Presumably after the first run much or all of the program is paged into OS memory
The numbers match quite nicely. 40gb program size minus 32gb RAM is 8gb, divided by 800mb/s makes 10 seconds.
kind of expected gcc to see right through the 300 gigs of code and compile it down to the tenish instructions.
Gemini took 4 seconds to answer this prompt: "Here is a number 4200020010101. Think deeply about it and tell me if it is not or or not even." So if you're concerned with privacy issues, you can run the assembly version proposed in the article locally and be well within the same order of performance. Let's thank the author of the article for providing a decent alternative to Google. ah, but the license is not that goo…
>Think deeply about it and tell me if it is not or or not even I think I just experienced a segfault
I have never seen anyone argue for a ‘switch’ version. switch (v) { case: 0,2,4,8,…: return EVEN; case: 1,3,5,7,…: return ODD; default: return IDK; } Slightly less code to generate.
you forgot the logic to strip the final digit and assign it to v. processing the whole number is absurd
You know, to save the performance cost of processing the input as a string, and chomping off all but the last character.
Gemini took 4 seconds to answer this prompt: "Here is a number 4200020010101. Think deeply about it and tell me if it is not or or not even." So if you're concerned with privacy issues, you can run the assembly version proposed in the article locally and be well within the same order of performance. Let's thank the author of the article for providing a decent alternative to Google. ah, but the license is not that goo…
Did you want to test the LLM's grammatical comprehension?
The technique actually has a lot of practical applications, so it's useful to have a C++ library that helps you with generating amd64 machine code.
I have never seen anyone argue for a ‘switch’ version. switch (v) { case: 0,2,4,8,…: return EVEN; case: 1,3,5,7,…: return ODD; default: return IDK; } Slightly less code to generate.
you forgot the logic to strip the final digit and assign it to v. processing the whole number is absurd