Live data from Hacker News

Roblox CEO interview about child safety didn't go well

kotaku.com

51–60 of 105 posts

Re: Roblox CEO interview about child safety didn't go well

#53

I don't have children, but friends and family do, and I had always heard Roblox presented as kid-friendly and kid-safe. This meant I heard about someone's child playing Roblox and, thinking it was kindof an electronic construction set, ie a great learning and play tool,[0] I felt no concerns at all. To describe this interview as a 'car crash' is almost underselling it. I feel terrified. Most of all, what are my frien…

> I had always heard Roblox presented as kid-friendly and kid-safe. Yeah, no. I have kids and have walked this path over the last few years. Roblox is, as a company, your standard big org. That is, completely amoral, extracting cash in whatever ways are possible, protecting users (kids) only to the minimal extent required by law or perception that might harm business. Very very little of their user-base are actually…

I'm interested in sources for your info about Roblox being choke full with pedos and the sophisticated techniques they employ.

Re: Roblox CEO interview about child safety didn't go well

#54

To say nothing of the Roblox situation, anyone else having a hard time reading this piece of "reporting"? It reads, to me, as so obviously slanted and opinionated against Roblox from the outset. It's not trying to portray facts, it's clearly trying to make the reader interpret the situation in an anti-roblox light, instead of letting the reader arrive there on their own.

Absolutely.

> Polymarket, a cryptoscam-based prediction market

How is this "reporting" even real? Awful article. The interview was so bad that painting roblox in the bad light was the right and objective thing to do, yet they somehow managed to make it look biased.

Re: Roblox CEO interview about child safety didn't go well

#55

To say nothing of the Roblox situation, anyone else having a hard time reading this piece of "reporting"? It reads, to me, as so obviously slanted and opinionated against Roblox from the outset. It's not trying to portray facts, it's clearly trying to make the reader interpret the situation in an anti-roblox light, instead of letting the reader arrive there on their own.

I didn’t have a problem with it, given the headline I knew it was commentary on a shit show of an interview from someone who should be prepared to answer hard questions and represent a company position to the public. I’m not offended by the opinionated writing given the context.

Re: Roblox CEO interview about child safety didn't go well

#56
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anything that's online and anything that has large multiplayer lobbies/worlds is inherently very low on the kid safety gauge, no?

Yeah, no. Nintendo, as the other poster said. Random stranger interaction == bad. Can’t verify age == bad. Can only add your friends for chat? Is fine. I feel like this same strategy is sane for adults also. Before the internet, we did fine making friends and playing games with people we actually know. So much of the awfulness of the modern online space comes from anonymous interactions with strangers. I don’t think…

> Can only add your friends for chat? Is fine.

I'm not saying it's not fine (depending on the age), but you won't convince me it's safer then playing Sim City 3000. It is inherently less safe.

Re: Roblox CEO interview about child safety didn't go well

#57

To say nothing of the Roblox situation, anyone else having a hard time reading this piece of "reporting"? It reads, to me, as so obviously slanted and opinionated against Roblox from the outset. It's not trying to portray facts, it's clearly trying to make the reader interpret the situation in an anti-roblox light, instead of letting the reader arrive there on their own.

Maybe someone who's pro-pedophile like Donald Trump could perform a more "fair and balanced" interview.

Re: Roblox CEO interview about child safety didn't go well

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It must be tiring though to keep the "neutral" approach for every article. How many benefits of doubts is Roblox owed, really? Asking for a more neutral tone is almost akin to asking for Hunter S Thompson to rewrite "The Kentucky Derby Is Decadent and Depraved" in a more neutral tone.

Let the facts speak for themselves. I agree the interview sounds damning. However it reduces the quality of the article to introduce Roblox as a "pedophile hellscape" right off the bat, or tell me how it was so impressive how the interviewer "kept his cool" in response to the answers. It's honestly the same style of writing anytime Fox news reports on any democratic action, or vice versa for other rags. Except this h…

Are you suggesting they should have introduced it as a "pedophile paradise" right of the bat instead?

Re: Roblox CEO interview about child safety didn't go well

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand the justified hysteria against pedophiles grooming kids. Although it is amusing coming from a country that is reeling from the Epstein affair. But this is not a Roblox problem it is an internet problem. And I do not know how to solve it except more censorship and control.

The solution has been throughout the ages, content moderation and community policing. The village used to be that. We were promised the Global Village, but got the Global Content Farms. If you can't run forums and chats because moderation is too expensive, then don't run 'em. Roblox is like the Pleasure Island in Pinocchio.

Wasn't pedophilia much more widespread throughout the ages than it is now? I think the real "solution" to the problem of child abuse back in time was not to view it as a problem at all!

Re: Roblox CEO interview about child safety didn't go well

#60
post #49

When I was a kid, I loved BBSs and the technicality of building a computer and the wild west that was the internet. Now that I have kids of my own, I won’t let them go near some of this stuff. It’s not because I’m worried they will do something dumb on their own but because I think tech has become predatory of all users and society in general.

The BBS scene was much more accountable. I mean, I met some weird dudes on there and consumed some weird stuff, but at the end of the day it was a local community, and everything was traced back to real people.

I tried to sign up as “Roger Rabbit”, who was 21, and therefore gain some access to a particular mov that was popular at the time. It was then that I learned two things:

- The sysop can talk to you directly!

- The sysop can see your phone number and knows Roger is that kid that signed up ages ago…

Met the sysop in real life some years later and he had thought the whole thing was pretty funny.

The point is that this was a local community; and the internet just doesn’t work like that.

Post reply on HN