Live data from Hacker News

Google Removed 749M Anna's Archive URLs from Its Search Results

torrentfreak.com

51–60 of 168 posts

Re: Google Removed 749M Anna's Archive URLs from Its Search Results

#51

Feels weird to say but I have found using Yandex of all places an excellent search engine for content that get taken down by DMCA requests. Eg if you want to watch a movie that's not on Netflix using a web stream the search results are far better. Feels like Google circa 2005.

[flagged]

Oooh scary, watch out for the Russian Boogeyman!

Re: Google Removed 749M Anna's Archive URLs from Its Search Results

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can turn off personalization. (Operating under the assumption that most people search for facts, I personally don't see why one would ever want personalized results.)

Location based personalization is pretty useful - if I search for 'Bob's Discount Linguine' I want the one in my neighborhood. Lots of niche things (like programming) also reuse common english words to mean specific things - if I search e.g. 'locking' it's nice to get results related to asynchronous programming instead of locksmiths because google knows I regularly search for programming related terminology. Of cours…

Can you show me what results you see for “locking”? I see dancing move in all profiles I have.

Re: Google Removed 749M Anna's Archive URLs from Its Search Results

#53

Google does search now? I mean, it's great to see but I'm not sure how this is going to challenge the convenience of my chosen brand of chatbot being able to find the same info without being scammed by 100 seo optimised junk sites.

No matter what my chosen brand of chatbot is, it can't help but hallucinate between 25% and 90% of the links it offers me. If it's not it's just proxying a google search for you itself.

Which model you using exactly?

Re: Google Removed 749M Anna's Archive URLs from Its Search Results

#54
post #46

Anna's archive has already fulfilled G's needs (training Gemini) so now it's time to pretend it never existed ;)

Did Anna's Archive also organize much of the world's information and made it universally accessible, for some time?

They’re… yes. Yes, that’s exactly what they have done and continue to do. Are you familiar with it?

Re: Google Removed 749M Anna's Archive URLs from Its Search Results

#55
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been playing around with a variety of search engines such as Kagi, Startpage, Ecosia, DDG. All of them are better than google in finding relevant results. Lol Google is way too "personalized".

Google hides the most relevant results on the 3rd page. It was confirmed in trial disclosures a few months ago. Their concern isn’t public search.

Google only ever returns a maximum of Bing only returns 900. Kagi only 200. Deep search and surfing is pretty much gone on all major search "engines".

Re: Google Removed 749M Anna's Archive URLs from Its Search Results

#56

Feels weird to say but I have found using Yandex of all places an excellent search engine for content that get taken down by DMCA requests. Eg if you want to watch a movie that's not on Netflix using a web stream the search results are far better. Feels like Google circa 2005.

[flagged]

For what it's worth, this is my first pro-Yandex comment after 17 years on Hacker News.

It's a major tech company service based in Russia, so presumably controlled by the government of Russia.

But the results produces for a query like "watch (obscure movie) online stream" are far better than what Google or Bing produces. If you need to check a scene of a specific episode of an obscure TV show, it's the fastest method (but happy to hear alternatives).

Also, the websites it links to aren't operated by the government of Russia.

Re: Google Removed 749M Anna's Archive URLs from Its Search Results

#57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can turn off personalization. (Operating under the assumption that most people search for facts, I personally don't see why one would ever want personalized results.)

Location based personalization is pretty useful - if I search for 'Bob's Discount Linguine' I want the one in my neighborhood. Lots of niche things (like programming) also reuse common english words to mean specific things - if I search e.g. 'locking' it's nice to get results related to asynchronous programming instead of locksmiths because google knows I regularly search for programming related terminology. Of cours…

Personalization would be good if it meant recognizing that I dislike blogspam, SEO'd pages, advertisements, and assuming my location.

Re: Google Removed 749M Anna's Archive URLs from Its Search Results

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can turn off personalization. (Operating under the assumption that most people search for facts, I personally don't see why one would ever want personalized results.)

Location based personalization is pretty useful - if I search for 'Bob's Discount Linguine' I want the one in my neighborhood. Lots of niche things (like programming) also reuse common english words to mean specific things - if I search e.g. 'locking' it's nice to get results related to asynchronous programming instead of locksmiths because google knows I regularly search for programming related terminology. Of cours…

I often find myself searching for information that's not from my locality. This sort of 'location personalization' frustrate such efforts so much that I rarely 'google' these days. What's the point of having access to the internet if that access is going to be restricted like this without consent? If they want to make my search experience more relevant, they should provide me an option to limit my search, rather than callously assume my intentions.

It's much more egregious on the Android play store. Many apps like banking, transportation and online shopping apps are geolocked for installation, sometimes even without the developers' request or knowledge. What if I'm flying over there in two days, or just want to help someone who's already there? And even when I'm there, I have to prove my presence by supplying the local credit card details! Nothing else is enough - not GPS, not cell tower IDs, not the IP ranges or whatever else.

This is just outrageous because I can't even get a device that I paid for, to work for me. This is just sheer arrogance at this point - a wanton abuse of their co-monopoly privileges. However, I'm not under any delusions that they're here to improve my digital experience. These corporations profit by restricting their "users'" experience on an otherwise fully open internet.

Re: Google Removed 749M Anna's Archive URLs from Its Search Results

#59
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did Anna's Archive also organize much of the world's information and made it universally accessible, for some time?

They’re… yes. Yes, that’s exactly what they have done and continue to do. Are you familiar with it?

I think the comment is saying Google was also doing that.

Re: Google Removed 749M Anna's Archive URLs from Its Search Results

#60

Feels weird to say but I have found using Yandex of all places an excellent search engine for content that get taken down by DMCA requests. Eg if you want to watch a movie that's not on Netflix using a web stream the search results are far better. Feels like Google circa 2005.

[flagged]

Genuine question: what can go wrong?
Post reply on HN