Live data from Hacker News

Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'

cnn.com

51–60 of 128 posts

Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'

#51
post #11

> “We are committed to operating like the world’s largest startup, and … that means removing layers.” I learned a long time ago that behaving like a startup is not a good thing, and I've specifically oriented my career towards working at companies that don't even want to pretend to imitate startup culture. I'm very happy in enterprise-land.

I joined an actual startup and am also very happy. We are just focused on making the product work. Not on promo docs or headcount fighting.

Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'

#52
post #33
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One of the better decisions I ever made was not ignoring emails from folks recruiting for Amazon in 2003. It was a different place back then, and truly like "the world's largest startup." The other thing that was different back then was that the people I worked with were all so blindingly smart. I'm pretty smart, but in 2003 I often felt like the dumbest person in the room[1]. In 2025 that feeling was rare, and not s…

I think it's reasonable to s/amazon/google in this post -- it's equally true there.

I never worked for google (interviewed but was rejected) but I have suspected this is true -- that there was a sweet spot where google was a magical place, but that time has long passed.

Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Culture of importing cheaper labor that they can manipulate. > The H1B program is broken and ripe for abuse. Offshoring is a much bigger problem. These abusive companies can "save" way more money by exporting the job than importing a worker to fill it, and pandemic-era changes have accelerated that.

I'm starting to think offshoring is better for America. Because house prices are unaffordable. Should a simple house really be $2 million ?

> I'm starting to think offshoring is better for America. Because house prices are unaffordable. Should a simple house really be $2 million ?

Do you really think it would be better for the rest of America to become like Detroit? Too few have jobs, so housing craters?

The solution to housing affordability is to build more housing (or relocate jobs to where housing is more affordable), it's not to make the common people poor.

Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depends on its location and how many dual earner high income households want to buy it. There is no reason a specific lot should not be worth an arbitrary $x.

Is such gross inequality really good for America?

You think offshoring current domestic high wage labor so that the US is exclusively split between low wage labor and ultracapitalists will reduce gross inequality?

Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'

#59
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem with reading that is that it is, I find, almost impossible to stop classifying people into sociopath, clueless or losers....

80% of the time, we all fit into one or more of those categories don't we? The problem is we move between those categories constantly.

Which is where that article series eventually goes, getting fractal on the categories and their inter-relationships and how people move between the categories constantly. That's also about where the article series starts to maybe get too self-serious and hard to read, though.
Post reply on HN