Live data from Hacker News

Saving Android From a Second-Rate Future

wired.com

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: Saving Android From a Second-Rate Future

#51
post #11

The article contains a common error: "Every iPhone comes with iOS exactly as Steve Jobs intended, which means developers know precisely what they’re getting." On Android, that's not the problem. All Androids, as uglified by OEM add-ons as they might be, are highly compatible with applications. All Androids running the same API level of Android, even the Kindle Fire, run all the applications that use those APIs. There…

>The problem is that "customized" Androids are hard to upgrade. Why are they so hard to upgrade?

Because the OEMs and carriers see them as integrated products and not as systems running an open kernel and open windowing environment. They don't see any point in separating the two, defining a clear interface specification between them, and upgrading the system software to match the hardware. If they did that they could release an update to the userland system that matches the kernel-land and lower level radio and hardware interfaces. Every android device could run an upstream-derived (and tracking) kernel and core system layer, with the binary graphics drivers and other closed components released on a schedule. Android, as delivered by Google for the Nexus series could run on every device.

Re: Saving Android From a Second-Rate Future

#52
post #48
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just saying, those numbers are driven by marketing, and the s3 is a newer device with better tech specs, plus the fact you can't get a JB device from any cellphone carrier.

And JB is required for a good experience how? How is JB required over ICS for that matter?

JB actually kicks ass. It's faster/smoother and has outstanding voice recognition. There's a number of small upgrades as well.
Post reply on HN