Live data from Hacker News

The myth of outrunning your diet

williamjbarry.substack.com

51–60 of 97 posts

Re: The myth of outrunning your diet

#51
post #7

God, that's a lot of writing. One, you absolutely can "outrun" a diet. If you've known anyone a little bit too much into fitness then you've known someone who has struggled to eat enough to maintain and build weight. I had a friend who would drink a gallon of whole milk a day to maintain weight because he did so much at the gym. I'm not saying it's healthy, but saying it isn't possible to exercise so much it's diffic…

> I had a friend who would drink a gallon of whole milk a day to maintain weight because he did so much at the gym. That honestly might be an absorption issue, not an intake issue - you can hit aerobic limits enough for your body to skip digesting stuff & just shove protein directly out of the stomach instead of bothering to break it down. My experience with this was a brief high altitude climb above 5km in the sky,…

GOMAD (Gallon of milk a day) has been a standard weight gain diet for decades

Re: The myth of outrunning your diet

#52

A great point to expand on here is the challenge, and huge benefits of finding activities we love. Sometimes it might be an obscure sport that is hard to discover or awkward to find locally, but when we find the activity we love to do great things happen, not just weight loss.

The real point we've learned recently is: "not weight loss". Exercise has a minimal impact on weight without a controlled diet.

Re: The myth of outrunning your diet

#53

I exercise a fair bit, and I still struggle to lose weight, I'm doing about 500 calories of movement a day, which means my maintenance diet is about 2500 calories. Trust me, it's really easy to go over that. So yes if you want to lose weight, it's just a fact that you need to look at your diet primarily.

I'm naturally skinny and trying to gain weight (muscle mass) and also do around 500 calories a day of movement so aiming for 3000 calories. It just goes to show what a big influence baseline appetite and food choices make because I find it really hard to eat that much and always wonder how people manage it in just three meals

I used to be naturally skinny and worked very hard to bulk up for years. At 41, I now regret that as I am heavier than I should be, though do not appear overweight. And I have osteoarthritis in my hips which the extra weight does not help.

Re: The myth of outrunning your diet

#54

I exercise a fair bit, and I still struggle to lose weight, I'm doing about 500 calories of movement a day, which means my maintenance diet is about 2500 calories. Trust me, it's really easy to go over that. So yes if you want to lose weight, it's just a fact that you need to look at your diet primarily.

Is 500 calories of movement a lot? Googling says that is running for about 45 minutes? Or walking for 90 minutes. Doing housework would only need about 2 hours to hit that.

Re: The myth of outrunning your diet

#55
post #54

I exercise a fair bit, and I still struggle to lose weight, I'm doing about 500 calories of movement a day, which means my maintenance diet is about 2500 calories. Trust me, it's really easy to go over that. So yes if you want to lose weight, it's just a fact that you need to look at your diet primarily.

Is 500 calories of movement a lot? Googling says that is running for about 45 minutes? Or walking for 90 minutes. Doing housework would only need about 2 hours to hit that.

500 calories excess is significant. Burning 500 calories in 2 hours doing housework is only an excess of ~300 calories, since you'd burn 100 calories an hour just sitting.

Re: The myth of outrunning your diet

#56
post #54

I exercise a fair bit, and I still struggle to lose weight, I'm doing about 500 calories of movement a day, which means my maintenance diet is about 2500 calories. Trust me, it's really easy to go over that. So yes if you want to lose weight, it's just a fact that you need to look at your diet primarily.

Is 500 calories of movement a lot? Googling says that is running for about 45 minutes? Or walking for 90 minutes. Doing housework would only need about 2 hours to hit that.

That's running 5 miles a day. Everyday. That takes months of training for an already fit young person to build up to.

90 minutes of extra walking is a lot of time to offset a snack that could be eaten in 1 minute.

Re: The myth of outrunning your diet

#57
post #37

Physical activity also makes me less hungry. The problem is that physical activity is unnatural and not intuitive. Biology is about saving energy, not spending it to keep everything healthy. Bad mental health leads me to do less physical activity. Bad mental health also makes physical activity more difficult and painful.

> physical activity is unnatural Very wrong way to put it

I mean spending energy for nothing

Re: The myth of outrunning your diet

#58
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ... then you've known someone who has struggled to eat enough to maintain and build weight. I'm not trying to strawman here, but I've never met a person like that who was ever overweight at any point in their life. It seems pretty obvious to me that saying "some people can't eat enough to put on weight / get fat" is a distinct thing from saying "someone who cannot stop putting on weight / getting fatter will almost…

> I'm not trying to strawman here, but I've never met a person like that who was ever overweight at any point in their life. This is an extremely common story for anyone who does through hiking on the Appalachian Trail (or Pacific Crest Trail, Continental Divide Trail, etc.). Quite a lot of people start overweight (although I have no idea what the percentage looks like). Almost everyone ends up losing a very signific…

That's definitely an outlier case.

And despite their choices of calorie-dense foods,

> gorging themselves at every opportunity

is a meaningful qualifier. Carrying your food will lead to restriction, naturally.

Re: The myth of outrunning your diet

#59
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ... then you've known someone who has struggled to eat enough to maintain and build weight. I'm not trying to strawman here, but I've never met a person like that who was ever overweight at any point in their life. It seems pretty obvious to me that saying "some people can't eat enough to put on weight / get fat" is a distinct thing from saying "someone who cannot stop putting on weight / getting fatter will almost…

You're missing something. More or less anyone can get to the point of being active enough where their body's ability to absorb calories is a limiting factor. It's not genetic or "some people" kind of thing, everybody has this limit and can hit it and people who are really excited about exercise and do a tremendous amount of it have to have strategies about how to get enough calories in their body on a day to day basi…

> It's a lot of activity to get to this point

Like a lot. Like professional athlete level.

Running 50 miles per week is a ton, easily top 1% activity level.

And all you incrementally need is a large slice of pizza, a coke, and a couple scoops of ice cream to make up for it.

Re: The myth of outrunning your diet

#60
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is 500 calories of movement a lot? Googling says that is running for about 45 minutes? Or walking for 90 minutes. Doing housework would only need about 2 hours to hit that.

That's running 5 miles a day. Everyday. That takes months of training for an already fit young person to build up to. 90 minutes of extra walking is a lot of time to offset a snack that could be eaten in 1 minute.

That is just the run, though? My point in mentioning the other things is that it isn't that much, all told.

I also 100% think that your offset point is a big part of it. 90 minutes walking the dog outside is doubly beneficial because you are not snacking during the time.

Post reply on HN