Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Space Elevator

neal.fun

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 414 posts

Re: Space Elevator

#52

Post by nunodonato »

Physkal wrote: post #19
_def wrote: post #7

The atmosphere of this reminded me of the game Outer Wilds

I was really disappointed not to see a sequel. No new games from the developers since.

they are working on a new game. Outer Wilds doesn't need a sequel, leave it be, its perfect as it is ::)

Re: Space Elevator

#54

Post by tsimionescu »

pbmonster wrote: post #41
Yizahi wrote: post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem with space elevator is not only the lack of material today, but also the fact that such elevator is an ultimate and very fragile weapons platform, you basically get stones up the well and then drop them on the enemy. Meaning that any authoritarian country would destroy it even before it is ever built. And sturdy enough space elevator after it's break at any high point would start falling down on the plane…

I don't see it. Why worry about a weaponized space elevator when stealth bombers, cruise missiles and ICBMs exist? If the power building the space elevator wants to bomb you, you're going to get bombed.

The bigger problem I think is the elevator itself. Cutting it and letting it fall would be far more destructive than any weapon ever fired or even conceived.

Re: Space Elevator

#55

Post by lloeki »

tempestn wrote: post #8

TIL it's estimated that over 48 tons of meteors hit the atmosphere every day. Regarding actual space elevators though, while they're not sci-fi to the extent of something like FTL travel - ie. they're technically not physically impossible - they're still pretty firmly in the realm of sci-fi. We don't have anything close to a cable that could sustain its own weight, let alone that of whatever is being elevated. Plus,…

Well if it's contingent to having massive amounts of unobtainium and subject to unsolvable engineering reality check conundrums then it's just as unlikely as an Alcubierre drive which "only" needs exotic matter that allows negative energy.

Re: Space Elevator

#58

Post by tsimionescu »

tempestn wrote: post #8

TIL it's estimated that over 48 tons of meteors hit the atmosphere every day. Regarding actual space elevators though, while they're not sci-fi to the extent of something like FTL travel - ie. they're technically not physically impossible - they're still pretty firmly in the realm of sci-fi. We don't have anything close to a cable that could sustain its own weight, let alone that of whatever is being elevated. Plus,…

While a space elevator doesn't contradict any fundamental limits of physics, that doesn't mean it's actually possible to build one. There is no reason to be certain that it's actually possible to create a material that has the required characteristics in terms of tensile strength to support it's own weight, plus the weight of the elevator, plus the weight of all the additional cabling. It also has to endure the huge temperature differences that it will experience along its length and from day to night and from season to season.

This is especially true considering that you don't need something that barely holds - you need something that you know will hold up to many times more weight than it needs to, so that it can be safe: the potential energy such a thing would store would be enough to dig into hundreds of meters of rock all around the world, if it ever crashed. So, you have to ensure there is no realistic chance of it ever crashing. It also has to be highly non-fragile in other ways, so that a madman with a bomb or a freak collision with an airplane or a meteor (especially likely in the thin upper layers of the atmosphere) won't bring it all down.

This combination of properties may well be completely impossible to actually achieve in a material. Even if there is no obvious basic law of physics that it would break, that doesn't mean that it wouldn't break other, harder to touch, derived laws.

Post reply on HN