Earlier quoted context omitted.
If it makes a difference: it's an en dash used in the readme. I've been wondering why LLMs seem to prefer the em dash over en dash as I feel like en (or hyphen) is used more frequently in modern text.
In my experience the em dash is still correctly used, the modern style has just evolved to put a space around it. So: * fragment a—fragment b (em dash, no space) = traditional * fragment a — fragment B (em dash with spaces) = modern * fragment a -- fragment b (two hyphens) = acceptable sub when you can’t get a proper em to render But en-dashes are for numeric ranges…
Edge AI for Beginners
51–60 of 67 posts
Re: Edge AI for Beginners
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or just by somebody that knows how to use English punctuation properly. Is it so hard to believe that there are some people in the world capable of hitting option + “-“ on their keyboard (or simply let their editor do it for them)?
I said em dash _and_ the word comprehensive. If you work with LLM generated text enough it gets very easy to see the telltale signs. The emojis at the start of each row in the table are also a dead giveaway. I am guessing you are one of those people who used em dashes before LLMs came out and are now bitter they are an indicator of LLMs. If that's the case, I am sorry for the situation you find yourself in.
Especially given that there are so many linguistic tics one could pick on instead! “Not x, but y”, the bullseye emoji etc., but instead they get hung up on a typographic character actually widely used, presumably because they assume it only occurs on professionals’ keyboards and nobody would take enough care to use it in casual contexts.
Re: Edge AI for Beginners
#53MS GitHub seems to be featuring a lot of beginners courses all at the same time. Wonder if they're just pumping them out with AI at this point.
Seems to be. There’s little chance this was written by a human.
Re: Edge AI for Beginners
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
I said em dash _and_ the word comprehensive. If you work with LLM generated text enough it gets very easy to see the telltale signs. The emojis at the start of each row in the table are also a dead giveaway. I am guessing you are one of those people who used em dashes before LLMs came out and are now bitter they are an indicator of LLMs. If that's the case, I am sorry for the situation you find yourself in.
> The emojis at the start of each row in the table are also a dead giveaway. What's up with the green checks, red Xs, rockets, and other stupid emoji in AI slop? Is it an artifact from the cheapest place to do RLHF?
I have no proof, sorry.
Re: Edge AI for Beginners
#55What are the best Small Language Models (SLMs) these days?
Best is very subjective depends what you want it to do and if you want to fine tune and how big you consider small
Thank you for any response!
Re: Edge AI for Beginners
#56Re: Edge AI for Beginners
#57But the modules that compare the different model families are quite good. As are the remaining modules that are "How to deploy to $platform 101", including microsoft's, of course ;)
Not that I have a better resource at hand for quantization/compression _for beginners_, and I am probably a bad judge for how beginner friendly Song Han's TinyML course was...
Re: Edge AI for Beginners
#58Re: Edge AI for Beginners
#59Always cool to see SLM support from a big company, albeit for inference