Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

hackerone.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 571 posts

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#51

Post by yreg »

chinathrow wrote: post #44
dansmith1919 wrote: post #10

Crazy how he doubled down by just pasting badger's answer into Chat and submitting the (hilariously obvious AI) reply: > Thanks for the quick review. You’re right — my attached PoC does not exercise libcurl and therefore does not demonstrate a cURL bug. I retract the cookie overflow claim and apologize for the noise. Please close this report as invalid. If helpful, I can follow up separately with a minimal C reproduc…

The '—' gave it away. No one types this character on purpose.

I do all the time, but might have to stop. Same with `…`.

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#53

Post by raincole »

badgersnake wrote: post #18
dansmith1919 wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At some point they told ChatGPT to put emoji's everywhere which is also a dead giveaway on the original report that it's AI. They're the new em dash.

Some people actually do that on Github too. Absolute psychopaths.

It was far before ChatGPT. I remember once on a Show HN post I commented something along the line with "The number of emoji in README makes it very hard for me to take this repo seriously" and my comment got (probably righteously) downvoted to dead.

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#54

Post by easton »

chinathrow wrote: post #44
dansmith1919 wrote: post #10

Crazy how he doubled down by just pasting badger's answer into Chat and submitting the (hilariously obvious AI) reply: > Thanks for the quick review. You’re right — my attached PoC does not exercise libcurl and therefore does not demonstrate a cURL bug. I retract the cookie overflow claim and apologize for the noise. Please close this report as invalid. If helpful, I can follow up separately with a minimal C reproduc…

The '—' gave it away. No one types this character on purpose.

Two dashes on the Mac or iOS do it unless you explicitly disable it, I think.

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#55

Post by [deleted] »

dansmith1919 wrote: post #10

Crazy how he doubled down by just pasting badger's answer into Chat and submitting the (hilariously obvious AI) reply: > Thanks for the quick review. You’re right — my attached PoC does not exercise libcurl and therefore does not demonstrate a cURL bug. I retract the cookie overflow claim and apologize for the noise. Please close this report as invalid. If helpful, I can follow up separately with a minimal C reproduc…

[deleted]

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#56

Post by ceejayoz »

chinathrow wrote: post #44
dansmith1919 wrote: post #10

Crazy how he doubled down by just pasting badger's answer into Chat and submitting the (hilariously obvious AI) reply: > Thanks for the quick review. You’re right — my attached PoC does not exercise libcurl and therefore does not demonstrate a cURL bug. I retract the cookie overflow claim and apologize for the noise. Please close this report as invalid. If helpful, I can follow up separately with a minimal C reproduc…

The '—' gave it away. No one types this character on purpose.

The AI is trained on human input. It uses the dash because humans did.

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#57

Post by dboreham »

scosman wrote: post #49

Spent 15 minutes the other day testing a patch I received that claimed to fix a bug (Linux UI bug, not my forte). The “fix” was setting completely fictitious properties. Someone has plugged the GitHub issue into ChatGPT, spat out an untested answer. What’s even the point…

Ultimately it's always about someone somewhere getting a bigger boat.

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#58

Post by teapot7 »

malux85 wrote: post #15

Wow even the followup response apologising for noise was full of noise. It finishes "I can follow up ... blah blah blah ... should I find an issue" Tone deaf and utterly infuriating.

For me the followup was the most obviously AI bit of writing - it's exactly the tone you get when the AI admits it's been utterly wasting your time.

Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here

#59

Post by jtwaleson »

rpigab wrote: post #13

"I heard you were extremely quick at math" Me: "yes, as a matter of fact I am" Interviewer: "Whats 14x27" Me: "49" Interviewer: "that's not even close" me: "yeah, but it was fast"

There should be a language that uses "Almost-In-Time" compilation. If it runs out of time, it just gives a random answer.
Post reply on HN