Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good point, added
Interesting, I actually expected it to encode a single letter with infinitely long combining marks such that 'highlighting' it was just highlighting one character.
Scream cipher
51–60 of 112 posts
You can do that too, if you increase the STACK_HEIGHT constant (btw, the decoder still works the same, so changing this doesn't break compatibility)
Re: Scream cipher
#52Now pack even more info in each character with Zalgo text.
zalgo256: https://gist.github.com/DavidBuchanan314/07da147445a90f7a049...
Hey, cool little rabbit hole there. I had totally missed all that.
Re: Scream cipher
#53Re: Scream cipher
#54Re: Scream cipher
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rot 13 is a cipher. It's a substitution cipher, and more specifically a shift cypher or Caesar cipher. It's not a secure cipher but it is one. Base64 is an encoding. It's an algorithm, no attempt at secrecy, thus not a cipher.
And thus we arrive at SCREAM64 encoding, base64 in scream cipher.
such a great idea that we ought to call it based64 encoding
Re: Scream cipher
#56Re: Scream cipher
#57Ǎầầặắǎaạặậā ạẵẫȁẳẵạ ẫằ ȂẤĂẮ, ǎẩằaăạ a ǟȁǎăấ ǡặaȧăẵ ằẫȧ ạẵǎǡ ạǎạậặ ẳǎàặǡ ầặ ȂẤĂẮ, ǎạ ăẫȁậắ áặ ăẫǎẩăǎắặẩạaậ, áȁạ Ǎ ảẫȁậắ ầặẩạǎẫẩ ǎạ ǎẩ ạẵặ äaẳặ ǎằ Ǎ ảặȧặ āẫȁ.
Re: Scream cipher
#58https://xkcd.com/3054/
Re: Scream cipher
#59Here's another implementation I made a few months ago: