Live data from Hacker News

Imgur's community was in revolt

404media.co

51–60 of 165 posts

Re: Imgur's community was in revolt

#51
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not to mention the liability of hosting users' media, which would have needed costly moderation to ensure nothing too illegal made its way in.

Nowadays just hosting text can get you in trouble if it is too pornographic in nature.

It’s probably now a lot easier to detect porn and automatically reject it. Set the filter to lean towards rejection for edge cases. You will lose out on racy bikini pictures, but maybe that is an acceptable compromise.

Re: Imgur's community was in revolt

#52

Imgur having a "community" is still the strangest part of this story.

It was originally a lot of Redditors, and then once (a) Reddit implemented image hosting, and (b) the 'big change' at Reddit happened a few years ago, the community grew from there.

Re: Imgur's community was in revolt

#53

Webdevs, why, why o why, do you have to ask me to subscribe to the newsletter before you even let me read the first 5% of the article? Do you really thing people read the first sentence and then go "yes, i definitely want to receive spam from this website! here's my email address!" or what?

Modal windows are just popups reborn.

But like all recurring viruses, they are more difficult to eliminate and continue to spread and popup when you least expect it.

Re: Imgur's community was in revolt

#54
post #6

It was interesting seeing all the image hosts in the old days. ImageShack, PhotoBucket, etc They'd either die because they couldn't afford the server bills or die because they went commercial. Some left gaping holes in forums etc when they changed.

What was really funny was people image leaching off of blogs and personal sites and the owners replacing the image based on the referral header to troll the forum users.

Yep, I did this. I had some art I’d made posted on my blog, and several somebodies liked it enough to make it the background of their MySpace page and use it as forum avatars/signatures. Pretty sure I saw a couple people using it in eBay listings too.

What made it bad is that they were using the full high resolution originals, not the thumbnails, which ate bandwidth like crazy.

So I did the referrer-based leech protection and started serving those users a tiny fake error dialog image, which was much more tame than what some people used. It’s funny how quickly those people stopped embedding, even without the image being anything shocking or objectionable.

Re: Imgur's community was in revolt

#55

I remember when imgur was created as a fast, no login-pushing, non-scummy alternative to ad-ridden clickjacking hosts that censored nsfw and controversial content. Then it became all of that on steroids except with a comment section and a weird community that didn’t realize they were living in the plumbing of other platforms like Reddit.

We knew. The situation is the opposite-- external users did not understand the interface and constantly posted things that were meant to be private onto the public feed.

Re: Imgur's community was in revolt

#56

Imgur having a "community" is still the strangest part of this story.

Discovering Imgur has its own community and culture is like finding out a group of people live in your closet. You can almost imagine opening the door to grab a coat only to find a dozen people who swear this is the place they bring various outerwear and talk about such things. When you tell them they're in a coat closet, they may get upset and assure you it's more than that, now.

Re: Imgur's community was in revolt

#57

This story is five days old and the revolt appears to be over. I don't see a single middle finger on Imgur's front page.

It also shifted a bunch over the course of the protests. After the middle fingers, they moved to porn (mass posting and upvoting clear TOS violations), and then just blackout posts (posting and upvoting solid black images). Somewhere in there was also posts of deliberately large images and videos to overload the servers.

I think at this point it has all but died down, but there still seems to be a bit of extra-racy content (which could also just be due to the new AI moderation being worse), and more large files (generally videos with "intergalactic quality" in the title).

Re: Imgur's community was in revolt

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A famous article on that: https://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1011

The fact that the image is still available is amazeballs in and of itself. It's left up to you to decided if you want to see which version of the grim reaper is available.

Jason Scott is still quite active in the tech community.

He’s one of the principals of archive.org, so that makes it less surprising.

Re: Imgur's community was in revolt

#60

What's interesting about imgur, and telling of how times changed, was that it was created mostly to fill the gap in unreliable uploading of images to reddit. Which begs the question: What the hell was reddit doing that they didn't immediately implement an image hosting feature to keep users on the platform? Imgur rose to fame because it was the darling image host of reddit users, and it wasn't long before imgur neede…

One of the other reddit admins will likely have a better answer, but at the time I worked for them (10-11), the answer was it was a complexity the reddit team didn't want to have to deal with.

Running an image host takes a lot of effort. You have to deal with removals, content policing, and the other nasties, as well as just having to deal with the sheer volume of data, which was a much larger concern in the 2010 era internet than it is now.

Reddit at the time just wanted to focus on being a link and text post site, much like HN is.

Post reply on HN