This seemed suspicious at first, but https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ (the original official site) confirms it's real.
The man himself also posted about it on his social media https://hachyderm.io/@simontatham/115025974777386803
PuTTY has a new website
51–60 of 304 posts
Re: PuTTY has a new website
#52https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/
Try Mines, you never have to guess.
Re: PuTTY has a new website
#53This seemed suspicious at first, but https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ (the original official site) confirms it's real.
Maybe just call this the Future Home of Putty or something with a big link to the official page.
I suppose word will get around pretty fast but still.
Re: PuTTY has a new website
#54putty.org is not run by the PuTTY developers
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44558328
Hijacking Trust? Bitvise Under Fire for Controlling Domain of FOSS Project PuTTY
Re: PuTTY has a new website
#55Re: PuTTY has a new website
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
So… what would be a trusted domain, for you, then?
https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/
Latest news
2025-08-14 New website, putty.software
We have a new domain name for the PuTTY website!
...
Re: PuTTY has a new website
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
The first time I ever saw it, the text already looked better than cmd.exe via conhost.
https://imgur.com/a/qA1fr71 Something wrong with my eyes? Doesn't cmd.exe look smoother in this screenshot?
Re: PuTTY has a new website
#58Somehow, these new long TLDs just feel spammy and "fake" and I usually ignore them when they show up in search results. Unfortunately the .com, .net and .org are already taken.
Re: PuTTY has a new website
#59Ever since Windows gained Terminal and OpenSSH, my usage of Putty has almost entirely ceased except for serial for embedded systems work. Then I realised Putty ships with a CLI version which I now use in Terminal for accessing serial.
Re: PuTTY has a new website
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Context: "The domain name putty.org is NOT run by the #PuTTY developers" ( https://hachyderm.io/@simontatham/114846017785770922 discussed before at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44558328 ), but by a competitor who historically used the site at that domain to promote their own product.
That looks like an open and shut ICANN trademark case to me. https://web.archive.org/web/20250728091154/https://www.putty...