UI vs. API. vs. UAI

Post by wvenable » Tue, Aug 12, 2025, 3:31 PM UTC

dathinab wrote: post #46

wvenable wrote: post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> no not at all extensible isn't the same as lenient I never said it was. But lenient provides for extensibility that isn't planned for. The entire evolution of the web is based on that. Standards that were too strict or too inflexible have been long forgotten by history. That's not to say that isn't the source of security vulnerabilities and bugs but that doesn't negate the point.

that is just not true web is mostly based on standards which always have been supper lenient, messy und had massive gaps of unclearity mainly because it was more "lets somehow standarize what browsers already do" then anything else through I guess you could say that the degree to which you can polyfill JS is more lenient then many thing is good and that did help with extensibility,

Post by com2kid » Wed, Aug 13, 2025, 7:26 PM UTC

mort96 wrote: post #40

com2kid wrote: post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not directly as strings of course, but a for loop that outputs a bunch of JSX components based on the array return values from a DB fetch is dynamically generated JSX.

No, it's not. The JSX, as in the text in the source file, is static. You can't accidentally forget to escape a string from the database and therefore end up with invalid JSX syntax, like you can when dynamically generating HTML. You're dynamically generating shadow DOM nodes, but the JSX is static.