* DC to NYC: 80 minutes.
* NYC to Boston: 80 minutes.
* NYC to Toronto: 2 hours and 45 minutes.
* NYC to Chicago: 4 hours and 35 minutes.
That would put a massive dent in air travel. One can only dream, I guess.Amtrak NextGen Acela Debuts on August 28
51–60 of 69 posts
Re: Amtrak NextGen Acela Debuts on August 28
#52Funny that this pops up while I'm on Amtrak (specifically California Zephyr).
Re: Amtrak NextGen Acela Debuts on August 28
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Executives have been talking like that for a long time :)
I always wondered about that part of press releases. Why do they always claim some executive said a paragraph of text that they very obviously didn't say? Who are they supposed to be saying it to? Is it like a transcript of an imaginary press conference??
It's so that articles can be easily written using the press release, no work necessary!
Re: Amtrak NextGen Acela Debuts on August 28
#54What is "5G-enabled Wi-Fi"? Does that just mean the train receives its connectivity via 5G and broadcasts Wi-Fi?
Yeah train wifi is generally terrible. Basically the only real solution is 100% 5G coverage along all train tracks or starlink. This is basically a global issue because line-of-sight for trains is a hard problem.
Re: Amtrak NextGen Acela Debuts on August 28
#55> In the coming months, Amtrak will be operating both the current Acela equipment and the NextGen Acela trains as the new trains transition into the fleet. I do hope that at the time of booking they make it clear which Acela it is. Airlines do this: they usually mention the type of plane while booking. I might just do a trip on the new Acela to experience the train.
Haha. We're talking about the same Amtrak that tries to hide that you are booking a trip on a bus.
Re: Amtrak NextGen Acela Debuts on August 28
#56wow, they took the AI emoji response and put it right in the press release
Re: Amtrak NextGen Acela Debuts on August 28
#57Unfortunately, this doesn't seem like it will speed up travel much at all. Based on my understanding, travel times in the northeast are limited not by the top speed of the trains, but by the tracks, and the fact that freight is prioritized.
Legally, freight is supposed to yield to passengers nationwide. It's in the legislation that created Amtrak over fifty years ago. It has never been enforced, and trump isn't about to do it. The UP/NS merger will make it worse. On Amtrak-controlled trackage, there is hope. Northeast Corridor is their show.
For as much as Biden purported to be a pro-passenger train President, you'd think he would have done something about that.
Re: Amtrak NextGen Acela Debuts on August 28
#58Re: Amtrak NextGen Acela Debuts on August 28
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s only true with short distances or crappy trains. I’ll drive DC to NYC rather than take the train, as it’s cheaper and not much slower. If Acela were a proper high-speed line I might switch. DC to Boston is close to a toss up, ~7 vs ~9 hours, but a proper high-speed train that did it in 2.5 hours would be really attractive.
With modern high-speed rail and a fairly modest average speed of 200 km/h (taking stops into account, because modern HSR can go >350 km/h), it would only take 3.5 hours to get from DC to Boston (passing through NYC).