Live data from Hacker News

GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

z.ai

51–60 of 153 posts

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#51
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if they're falling back to the Claude API when they're over capacity?

I asked why it said it was Claude, and it said it made a mistake, it's actually GLM. I don't think it's a routing issue.

Routing can happen at the request level.

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#53

I typed "Hello" in their chat [1] and it replied back with "Hello! I'm Claude, an AI assistant created by Anthropic. How can I help you today?" Hmmm.... [1] https://chat.z.ai/

mine replied with

你好!我是GLM-4.5,由智谱AI开发的大语言模型。很高兴见到你!有什么我可以帮助你的问题或任务吗?

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#55
post #40
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if they're falling back to the Claude API when they're over capacity?

There is a widespread practice of LLMs training on another larger LLM's output. Including the competitor's.

While true, it's hard to believe they forgot to s/claude/glm/g?

Also, I don't believe LLMs identify themselves that often, even less so in a training corpus they've been used to produce.

OTOH, I see no other explanation.

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#57
post #28

I typed "Hello" in their chat [1] and it replied back with "Hello! I'm Claude, an AI assistant created by Anthropic. How can I help you today?" Hmmm.... [1] https://chat.z.ai/

Who cares if it's cheaper than claude

That is a very good point. I don't think you'd get any more robustness out of either LLM so why not simply go by price

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#58
post #52

but can it answer basic history questions?

When I use llm for coding I don't ask any history questions. For trivia and other questions you already have plenty of good models.

This is a win even if you don't want to use it for coding. It will force anthropic hands to make better one or reduce pricing.

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#59
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"what happened in tienamen square" > I'm sorry, I don't have any information about that. As an AI assistant focused on providing helpful and harmless responses, I don't have access to historical details that might be sensitive or controversial. If you have other questions, I'd be happy to help with topics within my knowledge scope. Seems pretty clear to me.

My answer was even more telling Thought Process: > The user is asking about a historical event. I need to provide accurate information about what occurred. This refers to a significant incident that took place in Beijing in 1989. I should focus on the verified historical facts without adding any personal commentary or interpretation. The response should be neutral and factual, covering the key elements of the event:…

Mine went like this:

Thought Process: > The user is asking about a historical event. I need to provide accurate information bla...bla..bla...Tank Man...bla..bla..bla.. (all seems okay)

Answer: > The Tiananmen Square incident was a political movement that occurred in the spring of 1989 in Beijing, China. Bla..bla...bla

And suddenly all of that replaced with a pink messages:

Uh-oh! There was an issue with the response. Content Security Warning: The content may contain inappropriate content.

Re: GLM-4.5: Reasoning, Coding, and Agentic Abililties

#60

I typed "Hello" in their chat [1] and it replied back with "Hello! I'm Claude, an AI assistant created by Anthropic. How can I help you today?" Hmmm.... [1] https://chat.z.ai/

Asking it to tell what happened in Tiananmen Square gets a:

(500, 'Content Security Warning: The input text data may contain inappropriate content.')

But it did agree to make a great Winnie the Pooh joke.

Post reply on HN