Nice. But I would like it better if the effort was to support ext4, BtrFS, NTFS and other popular filesystems from the Linux and Windows world...
macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format
51–60 of 152 posts
Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format
#52Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format
#53Nice. But I would like it better if the effort was to support ext4, BtrFS, NTFS and other popular filesystems from the Linux and Windows world...
Apple recently made FSKit a supported/documented API, which should allow third-parties to add support for other filesystems: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/fskit?language=obj...
Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format
#54Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
NTFS has serious performance issues, nobody should use it.
AFAIK that's an incorrect meme that just won't die. The performance issues you're thinking of have nothing to do with the filesystem itself, but with the I/O subsystem in Windows more generally. If you have evidence otherwise please share.
For example ReFS removed the MFT which caused various problems.
Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple recently made FSKit a supported/documented API, which should allow third-parties to add support for other filesystems: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/fskit?language=obj...
3rd party supporting a file system would be one of the last things on a list of all software I’d ever want a 3rd party writing instead of the OS maker. Nightmare to evaluate the options, pure stress testing the options, difficult to know if it didn’t mess something up.
Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple recently made FSKit a supported/documented API, which should allow third-parties to add support for other filesystems: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/fskit?language=obj...
3rd party supporting a file system would be one of the last things on a list of all software I’d ever want a 3rd party writing instead of the OS maker. Nightmare to evaluate the options, pure stress testing the options, difficult to know if it didn’t mess something up.
Given how many people use FUSE, Paragon NTFS for Mac, and similar tools, you're hardly totally representative.
Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format
#58I have a meta question not directly related to the article but more about HN itself. I posted this exact link 9h before this submission was posted[1]. How is it possible that there is a new entry for the submission given the link is the same? [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=eclecticlight.co
Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a new disk image format. Not even a disk format. For virtualizing a disk. On which you can put a filesystem, yes. There seems to be an extraordinary amount of confusion in many of the comments, I don't know why.
> For virtualizing a disk. We really don't have enough disk formats in this space. Is this bringing something new ? Or is just polluting the namespace.
If only there was a whole post available so one could find out...
Re: macOS Tahoe brings a new disk image format
#60I have a meta question not directly related to the article but more about HN itself. I posted this exact link 9h before this submission was posted[1]. How is it possible that there is a new entry for the submission given the link is the same? [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=eclecticlight.co
Dupes are allowed after some number of hours.