VSCode with extensions Copilot [autocomplete] + CLINE [AI chat] + FOAM [obsidian-esk markdown support] is goat. There's no way a closed-source alternative to going to compete with this.
Have you given the alternatives a genuine test? My experience with Aider (never used Cline) is that it's nowhere near as good
Cursor 1.0
51–60 of 492 posts
Re: Cursor 1.0
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s more of a ticking time bomb because it relies so heavily on upstream model providers who all have competing products, particularly Claude Code.
Until Claude Code becomes manageable price wise, I don’t think Cursor really sees them as their competition. I can burn the whole cursor subscription price in a single day with Claude Code.
Re: Cursor 1.0
#53VSCode with extensions Copilot [autocomplete] + CLINE [AI chat] + FOAM [obsidian-esk markdown support] is goat. There's no way a closed-source alternative to going to compete with this.
Re: Cursor 1.0
#54Will be adding the Add to cursor button to Glama later today today.
If anyone from Cursor is reading this, we are rolling out MCP server usage analytics where we aggregate (anonymous) usage data across several providers. Would be amazing to include Cursor (reach me at frank@glama.ai). The data will be used to help the community discover the most used (and therefore useful) clients and servers.
Re: Cursor 1.0
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Until Claude Code becomes manageable price wise, I don’t think Cursor really sees them as their competition. I can burn the whole cursor subscription price in a single day with Claude Code.
They just announced Claude Code will come with the pro subscription ($20)
> Pro ($20/month): Average users can send approximately 45 messages with Claude every 5 hours, OR send approximately 10-40 prompts with Claude Code every 5 hours. [0]
I can probably run through that in 5 minutes.
[0] https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/11145838-using-cla...
Re: Cursor 1.0
#56Re: Cursor 1.0
#57I don't really see why people still use Cursor over tools like Cline / Roo Code. I'm guessing it's as they clearly have a larger viral marketing department than engineers, as the application itself doesn't perform nearly as well, requires you to have another IDE installed and their subscriptions nerf the models context sizes etc...
Like it or not, we're hitting the slope of enlightenment and some of us are ready to be done with the churn for a while.
Re: Cursor 1.0
#58I don't really see why people still use Cursor over tools like Cline / Roo Code. I'm guessing it's as they clearly have a larger viral marketing department than engineers, as the application itself doesn't perform nearly as well, requires you to have another IDE installed and their subscriptions nerf the models context sizes etc...
Re: Cursor 1.0
#59Cursor had been atrocious. Building on top of an already crappy IDE, you’d hope that they are at least keeping up with VSCode improvements and updates. But they are far behind and instead keep slapping on more garbage. The agent stuff is largely useless. The tab prediction go nuts every few seconds completely disrupting flow.
Huh, I have the opposite experience. The only tab complete worth anything is in Cursor.
Re: Cursor 1.0
#60I keep getting back and forth between Cursor and Zed, but Cursor autocomplete and next cursor prediction are still the best in class between all the competitors, I don't use chats and agents, yet I feel very productive and fast. I sometimes go back to Copilot too just to see how is it going but it has been very delusional so far regarding code suggestions. The only thing I hate about Cursor is the overwrite of some o…
That said, I do continue to think that agents are in this weird zone where it's more natural to want to interact through ticketing layer, but you kind of want to editor layer for the final 5%.