Live data from Hacker News

Cursor 1.0

cursor.com

51–60 of 492 posts

Re: Cursor 1.0

#51
post #7

VSCode with extensions Copilot [autocomplete] + CLINE [AI chat] + FOAM [obsidian-esk markdown support] is goat. There's no way a closed-source alternative to going to compete with this.

Have you given the alternatives a genuine test? My experience with Aider (never used Cline) is that it's nowhere near as good

In my limited tests, Aider and CLINE are very similar, but it's really hit/miss depending on the specific task.

Re: Cursor 1.0

#52
post #47
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s more of a ticking time bomb because it relies so heavily on upstream model providers who all have competing products, particularly Claude Code.

Until Claude Code becomes manageable price wise, I don’t think Cursor really sees them as their competition. I can burn the whole cursor subscription price in a single day with Claude Code.

They just announced Claude Code will come with the pro subscription ($20)

Re: Cursor 1.0

#53
post #7

VSCode with extensions Copilot [autocomplete] + CLINE [AI chat] + FOAM [obsidian-esk markdown support] is goat. There's no way a closed-source alternative to going to compete with this.

Why not? What does it do that Copilot Agent or Junie can't? All the competitors have a similar UX and the same selection of models.

Re: Cursor 1.0

#54
Exciting! Particularly the emphasis on smoother MCP integrations.

Will be adding the Add to cursor button to Glama later today today.

https://glama.ai/mcp/servers

If anyone from Cursor is reading this, we are rolling out MCP server usage analytics where we aggregate (anonymous) usage data across several providers. Would be amazing to include Cursor (reach me at frank@glama.ai). The data will be used to help the community discover the most used (and therefore useful) clients and servers.

Re: Cursor 1.0

#55
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Until Claude Code becomes manageable price wise, I don’t think Cursor really sees them as their competition. I can burn the whole cursor subscription price in a single day with Claude Code.

They just announced Claude Code will come with the pro subscription ($20)

Interesting, but the limit is really low:

> Pro ($20/month): Average users can send approximately 45 messages with Claude every 5 hours, OR send approximately 10-40 prompts with Claude Code every 5 hours. [0]

I can probably run through that in 5 minutes.

[0] https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/11145838-using-cla...

Re: Cursor 1.0

#56
I don't really see why people still use Cursor over tools like Cline / Roo Code. I'm guessing it's as they clearly have a larger viral marketing department than engineers, as the application itself doesn't perform nearly as well, requires you to have another IDE installed and their subscriptions nerf the models context sizes etc...

Re: Cursor 1.0

#57
post #56

I don't really see why people still use Cursor over tools like Cline / Roo Code. I'm guessing it's as they clearly have a larger viral marketing department than engineers, as the application itself doesn't perform nearly as well, requires you to have another IDE installed and their subscriptions nerf the models context sizes etc...

Because at some point we have to stop riding the treadmill and just pick a tool and use it to make stuff. Cursor was the first to really arrive at a useful agent mode. It does everything I need it to and more. It's not worth it to me to keep hopping to new tools every time a new one becomes the hyped up hot thing.

Like it or not, we're hitting the slope of enlightenment and some of us are ready to be done with the churn for a while.

Re: Cursor 1.0

#58
post #56

I don't really see why people still use Cursor over tools like Cline / Roo Code. I'm guessing it's as they clearly have a larger viral marketing department than engineers, as the application itself doesn't perform nearly as well, requires you to have another IDE installed and their subscriptions nerf the models context sizes etc...

Because my company decided to pay for everyone's cursor and I don't have the bandwidth to spend my time constantly evaluating what's better and pitching it?

Re: Cursor 1.0

#59
post #49

Cursor had been atrocious. Building on top of an already crappy IDE, you’d hope that they are at least keeping up with VSCode improvements and updates. But they are far behind and instead keep slapping on more garbage. The agent stuff is largely useless. The tab prediction go nuts every few seconds completely disrupting flow.

Huh, I have the opposite experience. The only tab complete worth anything is in Cursor.

I agree it has good completes, but it also hallucinates completes for blank lines or in the middle of typing a one word change and that can be irritating. Still better than plain VS code autocomplete though.

Re: Cursor 1.0

#60

I keep getting back and forth between Cursor and Zed, but Cursor autocomplete and next cursor prediction are still the best in class between all the competitors, I don't use chats and agents, yet I feel very productive and fast. I sometimes go back to Copilot too just to see how is it going but it has been very delusional so far regarding code suggestions. The only thing I hate about Cursor is the overwrite of some o…

I think not using agent chat is kind of a missing forest for the trees sort of thing.

That said, I do continue to think that agents are in this weird zone where it's more natural to want to interact through ticketing layer, but you kind of want to editor layer for the final 5%.

Post reply on HN