Live data from Hacker News

Canonicals Interview Process

dustri.org

51–60 of 82 posts

Re: Canonicals Interview Process

#51

> Their application was a duplicate with the same email address, Why do people use "they" and "their" for a single person? Is this the requirement for not misgendering someone?

Using a 3rd person possessive pronoun like this isn't unusual or "promoting woke", it's English.

Thanks. I rarely saw this usage before, hence the question

Re: Canonicals Interview Process

#52
Some of this tracks, but I don’t remember there begin so many steps when I applied (almost a decade ago). Mark was civil if a tad unconventional, but I remember the biggest reason I said no was that it turned out to be a contract position, not an FTE.

Re: Canonicals Interview Process

#53
post #15

This seems to be the canonical Canonical interview process – I've heard several stories like this over the years. It's always the same: interview process is overly long and a bit ridiculous, but things go relatively well. And then at the final stage Shuttleworth shows up to be a dick with a bizarre focus on high school, after which it's rejected.

This was exactly my experience last year. I even did a SAR to get all my interview notes. Glowing praise and positivity until Shuttleworth didn’t like 16yo me’s exam results (which I disclosed as part of the weird 4000 word essay thing in stage 1)

Re: Canonicals Interview Process

#55

The interview process says a lot about a company. Honestly, I would have run away at the very beginning with this weird focus on high school. If you can't be professional in your recruitment process, it's a big red flag. Assuming everything is true, he did actually dodge a bullet.

I suspect the make up of this company is going to be the most extreme of extreme mono cultures. The ‘what marks did you get in high school mathematics’ alone as a screening question (apparently an auto rejection if it’s not top 10%) and the ceo interviewing everyone personally gives a vibe of ‘you must have walked a very similar path in life as the boss to work here.’ Like there doesn’t seem to be any room to be the…

> A clone factory i assume?

Not necessarily, I would assume it's more of a 'yes man' mentality where you have to agree with everything the boss say (even when you didn't understand it lol).

Giving different opinion, counter argument, ... All the stuff that allows to make an educated guess and eventually take good decision is a big No-No.

The equivalent of fascism but in a company.

Usually the one who reach the top are those who suck it up, not based on merit. Overall bad working environment.

Thats how you end up with the famous Ubuntu-Amazon advertising relationship in the start menu, or the snap package.

Re: Canonicals Interview Process

#56
post #4

> At some point, someone bought him a plate, and he started to eat, without excusing himself about doing so Whoa, that dude is full of himself.

I don’t know how these people don’t make their own skin crawl. Sounds like scum of a human being.

Re: Canonicals Interview Process

#57

> I got three "strong yes", eight "yes", and a single "no" from Mark Shuttleworth Mark interviews are always the last in the process but since they’re the only ones that carry an automatic fail despite all other interviewer scores, they should be done first.

There's some weird twisted kind of logic here: Shuttleworth probably sees it as the other interviewers' job to weed out candidates so that he doesn't have to spend as much of his time interviewing candidates. It's a total waste in terms of man-hours spent interviewing, but it means Shuttleworth himself spends less time interviewing.

Re: Canonicals Interview Process

#58
Canonical brought us some interesting concepts, like cloud-init, and it's been my first choice for cloud-images, but this toxic culture of them motivates me to choose a better image. Or just something like Nixos.

Re: Canonicals Interview Process

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Using a 3rd person possessive pronoun like this isn't unusual or "promoting woke", it's English.

Thanks. I rarely saw this usage before, hence the question

It's been standard conversational English since the 1300s.

Re: Canonicals Interview Process

#60

I remember applying for a position a few years back. After I saw a bunch of questions related to high school I noped out due to weird vibes. Sounds like it was a good call

They did the same for me: I was - like the author - vague here, instead of "10/10 perfect score" and thus rejected pretty soon without any further information.
Post reply on HN