Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Though I don’t understand why US companies so afraid to make a bad hire given that it is easy to fire someone who doesn’t perform well in the US. I assume because in the US employees can still sue for what they would consider wrongful termination, especially if the worker is part of a protected group, making firing a very expensive endeavor in the end.
In practice this almost never happens. Even people who are actually discriminated against, which is very common, don't typically sue. It's a lot of work to sue, and while you're at it, you don't have a job or health insurance. Most workers are just focused on getting another job so they're not on the street or bankrupted by an unexpected surgery. I've seen now multiple cases of very obvious discrimination. Nothing ac…
Re: EA Pushes Full Return to Office, Effectively Ends Remote Hiring
#51If it's so easy to fire people with no consequences, how do you explain the reticence of companies to take some risks in hiring.