Live data from Hacker News

Where did the false "equal transit-time" explanation of lift originate from?

hsm.stackexchange.com

51–60 of 71 posts

Re: Where did the false "equal transit-time" explanation of lift originate from?

#51

No idea why you would provide the equal transit time theorem to students, it makes such a low amount of sense that you're inevitably going to get your students extremely confused if they are paying any attention at all. "Why does the air have to transit in the same time period?" "But _why_ is the air moving over the top faster? Weren't you going to tell me how a wing works?" Etc etc etc It is the worst kind of lie-to…

> Why does the air have to transit in the same time period? Because otherwise it would leave holes in it where one side moves too fast before joining back up. It makes more sense if you imagine air to be incompressable.

But the air does move faster above the wing without joining back up with the air moving below the wing, see the video jgord shared https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/how-wings-really-work

Re: Where did the false "equal transit-time" explanation of lift originate from?

#52

No idea why you would provide the equal transit time theorem to students, it makes such a low amount of sense that you're inevitably going to get your students extremely confused if they are paying any attention at all. "Why does the air have to transit in the same time period?" "But _why_ is the air moving over the top faster? Weren't you going to tell me how a wing works?" Etc etc etc It is the worst kind of lie-to…

> Why does the air have to transit in the same time period? Because otherwise it would leave holes in it where one side moves too fast before joining back up. It makes more sense if you imagine air to be incompressable.

Not at all.

Imagine two roads, parallel mostly, but then one takes a detour, like this:

         ____
    ____/ __ \____
 -> _____/  \______
    _______________
 -> _______________
Now imagine them full of cars, bumper to bumper.

Now imagine the cars move, at the same speed, on both roads. Same number of cars will come in on the left as go out on the right.

The cars will be bumper to bumper, both on top and below (there'll just be more cars on top).

Why should cars that come in at the same time on the left exit at the same time on the right?

Re: Where did the false "equal transit-time" explanation of lift originate from?

#53
post #5

“Just like the "explanation" of seasons by the Earth's changing distance to the Sun, or textbook pseudo-explanations of history, like the "crisis" over the discovery of irrationals, or Maxwell's "mathematical" reason for adding an extra term to Ampere's equation.” Love it! Anyone have any others?

"/usr stands for UNIX System Resources" And less technical: "The rainbow has 7 colors" "Sun is the day, moon is the night" So many things, i wish i had a name for these kind of traditional beliefs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie-to-children

short version:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lie-to-children&o...

Re: Where did the false "equal transit-time" explanation of lift originate from?

#54
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The very short answer is that the wing pushes the air down, thus (by Newton's 3rd law) the air pushes the wing up.

That's incomplete though; an asymmetric airfoil with 0° angle of attack does generate lift. The problem is the "equal times" -- the times are not "equal", but the air passing over the curved side does go faster.

Sure. By deflecting the air down.

> Cambered airfoils generate lift at zero angle of attack. When the chord line is horizontal, the trailing edge has a downward direction and since the air follows the trailing edge it is deflected downward.

Re: Where did the false "equal transit-time" explanation of lift originate from?

#55
post #5

“Just like the "explanation" of seasons by the Earth's changing distance to the Sun, or textbook pseudo-explanations of history, like the "crisis" over the discovery of irrationals, or Maxwell's "mathematical" reason for adding an extra term to Ampere's equation.” Love it! Anyone have any others?

"/usr stands for UNIX System Resources" And less technical: "The rainbow has 7 colors" "Sun is the day, moon is the night" So many things, i wish i had a name for these kind of traditional beliefs.

They are called "Common misconceptions" Wikipedia has a full page of them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_misconceptions

Re: Where did the false "equal transit-time" explanation of lift originate from?

#56
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Problem is electricity is kinda three different things, as far as models go. 1) DC; 2) low frequency AC; 3) Radio frequency circuits With DC, the water in pipes analogy is close enough to be useful. With low frequency AC, like mains electricity at around household voltages, there are additional considerations to make the water in pipes analogy to be useless enough we generally require people to be licensed to work wi…

The pipes analogy gives people a wildly unrealistic idea of the speed of electron movement in a wire. They only move a few mm/s at max current in copper wire. Electrons take minutes to go down the power cable from your PSU to your GPU. At GHz frequencies, they move less than an atom diameter.

How come? It seems it is very analogous to water in a pipe. Let's say I have a 30 m long garden hose. The water in it moves (in the order of magnitude of) 10 m/s in it. If the water is turned off, and I hold my thumb at the end of the hose and turn the tap on, I feel the water pressure almost immediately (the speed of mechanical waves in water). So it is obvious that there are two speeds. One is the speed of propagation and one is the speed of the medium, and they are way different.

Re: Where did the false "equal transit-time" explanation of lift originate from?

#57

If you google “how does a plane generate lift”, the first result you get is a link from nasa.gov which claims that lift is generated this way. Kind of funny considering the SE question includes a screenshot of another NASA resource claiming this is false.

NASA's (correct) position is that the dynamics of heavier than air flight are complicated and do not admit of a simple heuristic explanation

funny, there are films, of elaborite demonsrations of foils in a flowing fluid, where they can inject die in nice neat parallel bands accross the flow, and they detach at the foil accelerat and deform on the top, and reatch at the trailing edge saw them over on homebuiltairplanes.com, where there is a bunch of top shelf engineers, who hold court, and the perenial topic of lift is disccused and joked about, ie: lift is caused by money... films are old black and white...mit or bell labs, maybe naca....old....well done

Re: Where did the false "equal transit-time" explanation of lift originate from?

#58
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's incomplete though; an asymmetric airfoil with 0° angle of attack does generate lift. The problem is the "equal times" -- the times are not "equal", but the air passing over the curved side does go faster.

Sure. By deflecting the air down. > Cambered airfoils generate lift at zero angle of attack. When the chord line is horizontal, the trailing edge has a downward direction and since the air follows the trailing edge it is deflected downward.

But the air on the leading edge is deflected upwards when it hits

Re: Where did the false "equal transit-time" explanation of lift originate from?

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"/usr stands for UNIX System Resources" And less technical: "The rainbow has 7 colors" "Sun is the day, moon is the night" So many things, i wish i had a name for these kind of traditional beliefs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie-to-children short version: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lie-to-children&o...

Love this Sussman quote: “ In fact, this is an engineering model, in the same way that, [for an] electrical resistor, we write down a model V = IR—it's approximately true, but it's not really true; if I put enough current through the resistor, it goes boom, so the voltage is not always proportional to the current, but for some purposes the model is appropriate”
Post reply on HN