51–60 of 151 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm on the Google side of the equation. I think the title is a bit sensationalized, but that's the author's prerogative.
When are we going to be able to run sandboxed php code?
It's mostly useful for tracking what Python packages are available (and what versions): https://github.com/simonw/scrape-openai-code-interpreter/blo...
Ironically, though, getting the source code of Gemini perhaps wouln't be valuable at all; but if you had found/obtained access to the corpus that the model was pre-trained with, that would have been kind of interesting (many folks have many questions about that...).
It's actually pretty interesting that this shows that Google is quite secure, I feel like most companies would not fare nearly as well.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They leaked one file in the sandbox that contained lots of internal proto files. The security team reviewed everything in the sandbox and thought nothing in it is sensitive and gave the green light; apparently the review didn't catch this in the sandbox. I guess this is a failing of the security review process, and possibly also how the blaze build system worked so well that people forgot a step existed because it wa…
>that contained lots of internal proto files So does Google Chrome.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ok, we put the sandbox in the title above. Thanks! (Submitted title was "We hacked Google's A.I Gemini and leaked its source code (at least some part)")
Instead of sandbox can you just make sure people know it was not a meaningful hack? I mean I “hacked” this site too by those standards.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
you re the hacker or the google?
The google