51–60 of 95 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be clear: Your is stance that non-compete and stay-or-pay agreements do not interfere with employees' labor rights and that broadening their applicability is good ? Because that is what happened.
Do you have to sign noncompete before joining the job or after? If before, why not find another job? Is anyone forcing you to accept a job with noncompete? If after, they should be banned.
I'm glad my state took action on this topic. IMO noncompete clauses have no place in a free flowing market.
Unions, without the strong backing of government, seem to be the way to go.
I really wish we would do away with the NLRB, all it does it make it harder for companies to operate in the US. Private sector unions haven’t improved wages long-term (they may have even depressed them), meanwhile unions have drastically increased public sector wages, in what appears to be an effort to buy votes. Unions, without the strong backing of government, seem to be the way to go.
I don't think enough business people understand that having a well-defined legal framework for labor disputes is beneficial for their own safety and security, unless their expectation is that government ought to intervene on behalf of business but never on behalf of labor.
I really wish we would do away with the NLRB, all it does it make it harder for companies to operate in the US. Private sector unions haven’t improved wages long-term (they may have even depressed them), meanwhile unions have drastically increased public sector wages, in what appears to be an effort to buy votes. Unions, without the strong backing of government, seem to be the way to go.