Live data from Hacker News

Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku

anthropic.com

51–60 of 758 posts

Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku

#51
post #10

How does the computer use work -- Is this a desktop app they are providing that can do actions on your computer? Didn't see any such mention in the post

Quickstart is here: https://github.com/anthropics/anthropic-quickstarts/tree/mai...

Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku

#52

Why not rev the numbers? "3.5" vs. "3.5 New" feels weird -- is there a particular reason why Anthropic doesn't want to call this 3.6 (or even 3.5.1)?

Because its a finetune of 3.5 optimized for the use case of computer use.

Its actually accurate and its not a 3.6.

Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku

#53

Why not rev the numbers? "3.5" vs. "3.5 New" feels weird -- is there a particular reason why Anthropic doesn't want to call this 3.6 (or even 3.5.1)?

Because its a finetune of 3.5 optimized for the use case of computer use. Its actually accurate and its not a 3.6.

So 3.5.1 ?

Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku

#54

Why not rev the numbers? "3.5" vs. "3.5 New" feels weird -- is there a particular reason why Anthropic doesn't want to call this 3.6 (or even 3.5.1)?

Similar to OpenAI when they update their current models they just update the date, for example this new Claude 3.5 Sonnet is "claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022".

Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku

#55

Why not rev the numbers? "3.5" vs. "3.5 New" feels weird -- is there a particular reason why Anthropic doesn't want to call this 3.6 (or even 3.5.1)?

exactly my thought too, go up with the version number! Some negative examples: Claude Sonnet 3.5 for Workstations, Claude Sonnet 3.5 XP, Claude Sonnet 3.5 Max Pro, Claude Sonnet 3.5 Elite, Claude Sonnet 3.5 Ultra

2007: "Choose a Vista" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-feCRQBkSs

2024: "Choose a Claude"?

Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku

#56

since they didnt rev the version, does this mean if we were using 3.5 today its just automatically using the new version? That doesnt seem great from a change management perspective though I am looking forward to using the new one in cursor.ai

No, Claude's models use date-pinning. The new model endpoint is claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022

https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/about-claude/models

Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku

#57
post #15

Why not rev the numbers? "3.5" vs. "3.5 New" feels weird -- is there a particular reason why Anthropic doesn't want to call this 3.6 (or even 3.5.1)?

For a company selling intelligence, that's a pretty stupid way of labelling a new product.

It worked for Nintendo.

The 3ds and “new 3ds” were both big sellers.

Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku

#59

From the computer use video demo, that's a lot of API calls. Even though Claude 3.5 Sonnet is relatively cheap for its performance, I suspect computer use won't be. It's a very good idea that Anthropic upfront that it isn't perfect. And it's guaranteed that there will be a viral story where Claude will accidentally delete something important with it. I'm more interested in Claude 3.5 Haiku, particularly if it is inde…

It's just bizarre to force a computer to go through a GUI to use another computer. Of course it's going to be expensive.

With UIPath, Appian, etc. the whole field of RPA (robotic process automation) is a $XX billion industry that is built on that exact premise (that it's more feasible to do automation via GUIs than badly built/non-existing APIs).

Depending on how many GUI actions correspond to one equivalent AI orchestrated API call, this might also not be too bad in terms of efficiency.

Re: Computer use, a new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 3.5 Haiku

#60

Why not rev the numbers? "3.5" vs. "3.5 New" feels weird -- is there a particular reason why Anthropic doesn't want to call this 3.6 (or even 3.5.1)?

Because its a finetune of 3.5 optimized for the use case of computer use. Its actually accurate and its not a 3.6.

I don't think that's correct. This looks like a new model. Significant jump in math and gpqa scores.
Post reply on HN