TLDR: Linus at a Q&A, a woman asks why Nvidia still isn't providing any support for Optimus on Linux, Linus responds that Nvidia is being really difficult about that without good reason and "Fuck You Nvidia!" (flicks off the camera). Her question actually starts a minute earlier than the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MShbP3OpASA&t=48m14s PS - Bravo Linus. This is issue is a real PITA, and a bit incongruent con…
Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds
51–60 of 147 posts
Re: Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds
#52You should have titled it "Linus Torvalds Angry at Nvidia, Flips the Finger at Speach" or something.
That would have been more descriptive, just a heads up for next time! ;)
Re: Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds
#53Re: Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unlike Intel and ATI, Nvidia doesn't play nice with open source developers.
While this is true, nvidia's closed-source drivers do have the virtue of actually working . (ok, this is slightly unfair to intel's video drivers, they work fine as long as you don't need 3D acceleration)
Re: Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds
#55Re: Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the real issue is that Nvidia is the most closed when it comes to releasing specs. With the proper specs, open source developers will produce better drivers than Nvidia.
> With the proper specs, open source developers will produce better drivers than Nvidia. That may be true for specific features like Optimus--I can't say. But if you're talking about writing a full 3D driver stack for a modern GPU, you're almost certainly underestimating the effort involved by several orders of magnitude. NVIDIA has hundreds of full-time software engineers working on the various parts of the GPU driv…
Re: Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
That doesn't reflect his opinion. First, Linus states Nvidia is an exception, one of the worst trouble spots. And he is also very upset because Nvidia at the same time tries to sell a lot of chips into the Android market, a Linux based system. Very ungrateful of Nvidia. I agree, fuck Nvidia.
Ungrateful? Since when is that part of any sensible business plan? I don't know why Linus would expect a corporation to devote significant resources to an endeavor out of kindness. Nvidia will play nicely with Linux when it becomes in their financial interests to do so. Edit: I expected downvotes and I'll gladly take them if someone can explain to me how Nvidia is being unreasonable.
Not to disagree with your point (which is right), but It becomes in NVidia's financial interests when they have negative press coverage because someone like Linus says bad things about them.
I hope you understand what I am saying. Linus isn't just talking in an abstract-intellectual environment, his voice is strongly publicised and is here he is using it as an activist, to force NVidia into action. Its all part of the game...
Re: Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds
#58So, when people are reading the comments of this submission in the future, please keep this in mind as a historical note. (This, humorously, was actually the kind of situation that caused the complaint[1] that itself turned into a massive hullabaloo recently regarding what can be discussed on HN and what the policies regarding hell-banning are; to view the reference you will need showdead.)
Re: Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds
#59Let the memes begin! Here's an image template of Linus giving the finger: https://skitch.com/cpinto/ebemj/linus
Re: Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unlike Intel and ATI, Nvidia doesn't play nice with open source developers.
While this is true, nvidia's closed-source drivers do have the virtue of actually working . (ok, this is slightly unfair to intel's video drivers, they work fine as long as you don't need 3D acceleration)