>> Consumers these days expect year-round availability of a product, which is consistent every time a person buys it, eats it, and cooks with it. It's like a fairy tale witch cursed us all for our greed: you will have any food you like any time you like it, but it will taste bland and boring and you will long for a taste you have never known. That's why people get so protective of their food culture, even their food…
> we'll all end up eating food that it is just nutritious enough to keep us from starving That's not a problem with "big food" - the food is far too nutritious and abundant . Sugary cereals for children and big macs can't be described at "just keeping us from starving". We want restricted (but complete) nutrition that is just enough to keep us from starving, so that we maintain our size and don't end up with an energ…
Nutrition as you define it seems to be purely calories. Another definition would be complete micronutrient profile.
Taste as you define it seems to be fat, sugar, salt. Another definition would be complexity of taste.
Big food currently optimizes for the first definitions of above which is bad for long term health. Second definitions of above would be better for long term health.