Live data from Hacker News

Goldman on Generative AI: doesn't justify costs or solve complex problems [pdf]

web.archive.org

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: Goldman on Generative AI: doesn't justify costs or solve complex problems [pdf]

#51
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with what you say above, but my perception is that most people still view the current crop of models as a step or two away from superintelligence. That superintelligence, or AGI, is a matter of continued improvement along the current lines, rather than along entirely different lines.

I don't think we can really say what path would lead to superintelligence (for whichever definition you desire) in the near future. Perhaps it is technically possible to achieve merely by making an embodied agent with enough different tricks in a single model (which I see as a matter of continued improvement along current lines), or maybe it requires several new things we haven't conceived yet. Personally, my area of…

Thanks for the link to Vinge's thing - I hadn't read that. Shame he didn't get the superintelligence within thirty years of 1993 and died in 2024. Still soonish. I've always been interested in physics and have a hunch that we can't figure things like quantum gravity due to mind limitations. If an AI could do that that would really be superintelligence.

Re: Goldman on Generative AI: doesn't justify costs or solve complex problems [pdf]

#52

This interview by Adam Conover, really is a wonderful discussion on the topic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8ByoAt5gCA I was pretty amazed with GPT when it came up, but increasingly find it makes to many mistakes. I full use it as a tool in writing code, but it needs to be treated as Intellisense plus, or something to that affect, not something that will handle complex tasks. GPT and Claude make many mistakes and…

they seem pissed off at capitalism and big tech. Thats all that interview was .
Post reply on HN