Earlier quoted context omitted.
My problem with similar sensors is that they don't work very well if you're sitting still around 3m away. Maybe my sensor isn't great, but when I'm sitting still at the computer, it frequently thinks I'm not there any more, which ruins any benefit.
A hack is to put a sensor on the chair
Inside a $1 radar motion sensor
51–60 of 108 posts
Re: Inside a $1 radar motion sensor
#52A little tangential, but are these things safe for humans? I have a couple of LD2410 devices and I’d like to use one of them with ESPHome in the bedroom. I did some research and they seem to be very low power and safe, but you know, before sleeping with a radar pointing at us all night long, I’m looking for as much feedback as possible.
The only mechanism besides ionization that could harm humans is through the transfer of lots of power into the human body (think soldiers keeping themselves warm by stepping in front of a radar emitter).
So let's try to do a ballpark estimate of how much that could matter.
I haven't found (from a quick search) any data regarding the transmission power, but the data sheet at https://fcc.report/FCC-ID/2AD56HLK-LD2410B-P/6620025.pdf says the average current consumption is 79mA at 5V, which means it uses 0.4W.
How much of that is actually transmitted? I'd guess 10%-50% (likely much less, but let's go with this more conservative estimate, from a safety perspective), so now we're in the range of 40mW to 200mW.
If you absorb 1/4th of that (again, somewhat conservative estimate; you'll likely also reflect some, and most of it is going to pass you), we're at 10mW to 50mW extra power that is absorbed by your tissue.
Again, this is a super high (and thus for our purpose, conservative) estimate. Somebody else in this thread mentioned microwatts being absorbed, which sounds much more plausible.
To put this into context, the base level of power that an adult human operates on at rest is about 100W. This is a factor of 500 to 2500 more than the power absorbed from our millimeter wave radar. Unless all the absorption happens by a very specific and sensitive part of the body (like your eyes or so), this should just be background noise.
If you want another perspective, you could try to compare it with whatever radiation (both RF and heat) that your phone emits, that you likely carry in your pocket for hours at a time.
Re: Inside a $1 radar motion sensor
#53A little tangential, but are these things safe for humans? I have a couple of LD2410 devices and I’d like to use one of them with ESPHome in the bedroom. I did some research and they seem to be very low power and safe, but you know, before sleeping with a radar pointing at us all night long, I’m looking for as much feedback as possible.
Non-ionizing radio waves are generally safe for humans. The only mechanism besides ionization that could harm humans is through the transfer of lots of power into the human body (think soldiers keeping themselves warm by stepping in front of a radar emitter). So let's try to do a ballpark estimate of how much that could matter. I haven't found (from a quick search) any data regarding the transmission power, but the d…
Holy, did people actually do this? A quick search yielded no results. Not sure if thankful or not.
Re: Inside a $1 radar motion sensor
#54Re: Inside a $1 radar motion sensor
#55Re: Inside a $1 radar motion sensor
#56Through-wall 2.4Ghz Wi-Fi CSI radar can be done with $20 ESP32 boards, https://github.com/Marsrocky/Awesome-WiFi-CSI-Sensing & https://www.cnx-software.com/2022/08/08/esp-wifi-csi-detects... > Espressif claims it can also capture subtle movements caused by small movements such as breathing and chewing of people or animals in a static environment.. works with all ESP32 series microcontrollers including ESP32, ESP32-S2…
Re: Inside a $1 radar motion sensor
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it's also survivorship bias. All the people who tell you they're vegan being vegan does not mean that all the people who are vegan will tell you they're vegan, just like all the people who won the lottery probably having bought lots of tickets does not mean that buying lots of tickets will win you the lottery.
That's what I meant, maybe I used the wrong bias name.
Still, I'm not sure if it's a big factor. You likely know who is vegan in your circles, because veganism is unusual enough to be a good topic for gossip, you can easily see it when sharing a meal with someone, and it's also something you'd like to know when inviting people over, if you want to be a good host. So I think a more relevant estimate would be number of vegans you know vs. how many of them announce their veganism at the earliest opportunity.
Re: Inside a $1 radar motion sensor
#58Since the user manual for this sensor mentions security monitoring as a possible application, I'm wondering: is there any simple way to prevent detection from such a mm wave radar? (Assuming for simplicity that we know where it's mounted, and in which direction it's pointing).
[1] https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journa...
[2] https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/tc/d1tc0...