Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course it’s not nearly as much as it should be, but it is certainly a step in the right direction.
Incrementalism normalizes dystopia, in my view; this becomes just another contingency that can be budgeted for. Imagine, by contrast, the impact that executing one Chiquita executive would have.
Banana giant Chiquita held liable by US court for funding paramilitaries
51–60 of 343 posts
Re: Banana giant Chiquita held liable by US court for funding paramilitaries
#52Through at least two administrations, Republican and Democrat, Bush and Obama, the U.S. has funded anti-leftist militarism in Colombia, to the military and to paramilitary groups like AUC. It's not just a fruit company and it's not just a relic from the past. http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2013/12/21/co...
[flagged]
Re: Banana giant Chiquita held liable by US court for funding paramilitaries
#53See also the Banana Massacre instigated by the United Fruit Company against plantation workers making outrageous demands like limiting the work week to 6 days. 100 years later, that company operates under the name Chiquita. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_Massacre
Re: Banana giant Chiquita held liable by US court for funding paramilitaries
#54Through at least two administrations, Republican and Democrat, Bush and Obama, the U.S. has funded anti-leftist militarism in Colombia, to the military and to paramilitary groups like AUC. It's not just a fruit company and it's not just a relic from the past. http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2013/12/21/co...
[flagged]
Re: Banana giant Chiquita held liable by US court for funding paramilitaries
#55Through at least two administrations, Republican and Democrat, Bush and Obama, the U.S. has funded anti-leftist militarism in Colombia, to the military and to paramilitary groups like AUC. It's not just a fruit company and it's not just a relic from the past. http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2013/12/21/co...
[flagged]
Anyway, I corrected that typo. Please, oh please, take me seriously now.
Re: Banana giant Chiquita held liable by US court for funding paramilitaries
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Also calling it anti-leftist is just poor framing, paramilitar organizations have very close ties with the right-wing politicians here.
Does that make it more likely those paramilitary organizations are on the left, or on the right?
Re: Banana giant Chiquita held liable by US court for funding paramilitaries
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course it’s not nearly as much as it should be, but it is certainly a step in the right direction.
Incrementalism normalizes dystopia, in my view; this becomes just another contingency that can be budgeted for. Imagine, by contrast, the impact that executing one Chiquita executive would have.
Re: Banana giant Chiquita held liable by US court for funding paramilitaries
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also calling it anti-leftist is just poor framing, paramilitar organizations have very close ties with the right-wing politicians here.
> "Paramilitary organizations have very close ties with the far-right politicians here." Does that make it more likely those paramilitary organizations are on the left, or on the right?
Re: Banana giant Chiquita held liable by US court for funding paramilitaries
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
> "Paramilitary organizations have very close ties with the far-right politicians here." Does that make it more likely those paramilitary organizations are on the left, or on the right?
I think they're implying that anti-leftist isn't the same as far-right. A centrist could in theory function as an anti-leftist.
Re: Banana giant Chiquita held liable by US court for funding paramilitaries
#60Allegedly also Coca-Cola, Drummond and even some local companies like Postobón have been involved with paramilitary groups and sponsored crimes against civilians - and haven't faced any consequences. But this is a good precedent.