India banned TikTok (without the option to divest) and everything was fine. And they didn't limit the ban to TikTok: "TikTok wasn’t a one-off case. Today, India has banned over 500 Chinese apps to date." [1] If ByteDance won't sell, let them shutdown. It is truly baffling to me that anyone would defend a company's right to operate freely in the U.S. when it is controlled by a brutal autocracy that is also an emerging…
In India users that had it installed could continue to use it. And downloading it in India is trivial. On iPhone it's as simple as changing your region, on Android you just need to install the APK (installer) - which TikTok makes conveniently available on their website. I learned this from a quick search of 'how to install TikTok in India' which is apparently quite the common search in India. [1] I tried to dig up so…
ByteDance prefers TikTok shutdown in US if legal options fail, sources say
51–60 of 75 posts
Re: ByteDance prefers TikTok shutdown in US if legal options fail, sources say
#52It never was about ByteDance. It's the Chinese government who will decide. From their point of view, the right strategic move is to shut it down. Even if every other country bans the app it doesn't impact them much. Also they hate doing things that make then look weak. If they sell, they lose their influence. If they shut down, same thing.
Not really. ByteDance is based in Singapore. They can sell it to whoever they like, but most of their operations are based in China and even if they could be sold, who in their right mind would buy that? Because it doesn’t solve the real issue - 100,000 employees in China is a dead end for any acquirer.
Re: ByteDance prefers TikTok shutdown in US if legal options fail, sources say
#53It never was about ByteDance. It's the Chinese government who will decide. From their point of view, the right strategic move is to shut it down. Even if every other country bans the app it doesn't impact them much. Also they hate doing things that make then look weak. If they sell, they lose their influence. If they shut down, same thing.
Not really. ByteDance is based in Singapore. They can sell it to whoever they like, but most of their operations are based in China and even if they could be sold, who in their right mind would buy that? Because it doesn’t solve the real issue - 100,000 employees in China is a dead end for any acquirer.
Is it? Wikipedia seems to disagree:
> ByteDance Ltd. is a Chinese internet technology company headquartered in Haidian, Beijing and incorporated in the Cayman Islands.
The only mention of Singapore is in reference to launching a music service there.
Do you have information you can reference that isn't available in the Wikipedia article?
Re: ByteDance prefers TikTok shutdown in US if legal options fail, sources say
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
In India users that had it installed could continue to use it. And downloading it in India is trivial. On iPhone it's as simple as changing your region, on Android you just need to install the APK (installer) - which TikTok makes conveniently available on their website. I learned this from a quick search of 'how to install TikTok in India' which is apparently quite the common search in India. [1] I tried to dig up so…
Doesn’t China also demand complete control of foreign apps in their country? Correct me if I’m wrong but my understanding is that the CCP demands specific changes to or outright removal of apps all the time.
They are a self described democratic dictatorship with a system that openly and voluntarily chooses to sacrifice individual liberty and freedom for what they see as the collective good. That is their right as a sovereign power, but it is not a system I would like to live under. And any movement in this sort of direction is something that I think should be actively opposed.
[1] - http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/Constitution/node_282...
Re: ByteDance prefers TikTok shutdown in US if legal options fail, sources say
#55It’s exciting to think that by this time next year, TikTok can be nothing more than a distant memory. RIP Vine
There will just be something else that's basically the same thing
A person with a phone could go viral and reach thousands if not millions in a day.
Today, Tiktok has largely throttled the viral nature of their algorithm. You have spend money on paid advertising if you want to reach millions of people. Yes, there are still videos that get millions of views, but it is hit or miss now.
Re: ByteDance prefers TikTok shutdown in US if legal options fail, sources say
#56India banned TikTok (without the option to divest) and everything was fine. And they didn't limit the ban to TikTok: "TikTok wasn’t a one-off case. Today, India has banned over 500 Chinese apps to date." [1] If ByteDance won't sell, let them shutdown. It is truly baffling to me that anyone would defend a company's right to operate freely in the U.S. when it is controlled by a brutal autocracy that is also an emerging…
Re: ByteDance prefers TikTok shutdown in US if legal options fail, sources say
#57I wonder if this choice will have an effect on the upcoming US elections, with TikTok users blaming the current government for losing access to their favourite app.
Re: ByteDance prefers TikTok shutdown in US if legal options fail, sources say
#58It’s exciting to think that by this time next year, TikTok can be nothing more than a distant memory. RIP Vine
Re: ByteDance prefers TikTok shutdown in US if legal options fail, sources say
#59India banned TikTok (without the option to divest) and everything was fine. And they didn't limit the ban to TikTok: "TikTok wasn’t a one-off case. Today, India has banned over 500 Chinese apps to date." [1] If ByteDance won't sell, let them shutdown. It is truly baffling to me that anyone would defend a company's right to operate freely in the U.S. when it is controlled by a brutal autocracy that is also an emerging…
[flagged]
Nice spin playing on the hacker ethos here.
Although information is in its name, it gets its full meaning from its suffix. MISinformation is the missing of information or the mis-leading of an audience by spinning purposefully false rhetoric and delivering arguments for a false narrativvve.
It is very closely related to propaganda, but with a different aim. The aim here is not to have someone look good but to destabelize and subvert.
So although it is containing information in its name, neither it nor propaganda can be labeled information.
Who would want to consume lies freely anyways?
Also, nice addendum of the first amendment btw., the right of US citizens to express their opinions is not being curtailed here. It is just a medium that is under scrutiny and, I might add, for a very very good reason.
Re: ByteDance prefers TikTok shutdown in US if legal options fail, sources say
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Hmmm...... Nice spin playing on the hacker ethos here. Although information is in its name, it gets its full meaning from its suffix. MISinformation is the missing of information or the mis-leading of an audience by spinning purposefully false rhetoric and delivering arguments for a false narrativvve. It is very closely related to propaganda, but with a different aim. The aim here is not to have someone look good but…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamont_v._Postmaster_General