Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are speculating, but there is no telling if it ever even happened. I tend to believe the site's news was just more interesting than what OOP posted.
That's Paul Graham's account, so maybe not just speculation. I didn't realize he still read this site. Not to jump on to OPs paranoia but I kind of thought he was frequenting some secret meta-HN site that still talks about entrepreneurship. Paul, if you see this, let me in! I swear I won't complain about capitalism!
Lions OS: secure – fast – adaptable
51–60 of 64 posts
Re: Lions OS: secure – fast – adaptable
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's Paul Graham's account, so maybe not just speculation. I didn't realize he still read this site. Not to jump on to OPs paranoia but I kind of thought he was frequenting some secret meta-HN site that still talks about entrepreneurship. Paul, if you see this, let me in! I swear I won't complain about capitalism!
It's my account, not Paul Graham's.
Re: Lions OS: secure – fast – adaptable
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been waiting for a system like this for over a decade to use as my daily driver. An OS that runs with a capability model like this is immune to whole classes of security exploits that guarantee Linux, Windows, MacOS, etc. will never be secure. I was hoping Genode would get there sooner, and GNU Hurd should have gotten there years ago. Capabilities are the computing version of circuit breakers. They make it possi…
FWIW, I would not trust seL4 on x86. Last time I checked, seL4’s interaction with the x86 architecture was not formally verified and looked quite buggy. Even a microkernel has three things that form part of the TCB: the part that interfaces with the even-lower-level stuff (interrupt and exception handlers, paging, memory model, etc), the interface it provides to its clients (syscalls and whatever it provides via sysc…
I would not trust any system on x86.
>AIUI, the situation on ARM is likely better.
Somewhat, but still not good.
RISC-V is where it's at, when it comes to seL4.
(seL4 participates in RISC-V)
Re: Lions OS: secure – fast – adaptable
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s what I inferred from your comment
Nothing like your inference was in my comment, beside the seemingly obvious fact nobody would use such a 'spam detector'. But either way, you can trivially verify this yourself just by looking at /newest.
Re: Lions OS: secure – fast – adaptable
#55Question: under what circumstances would I ever want to use this OS, over Linux or MacOS or Windows?
All circumstances where correctness and security are more important than maximum possible performance, once it's mature enough (which will probably never happen), since it provides a proper and secure architecture.
Re: Lions OS: secure – fast – adaptable
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nothing like your inference was in my comment, beside the seemingly obvious fact nobody would use such a 'spam detector'. But either way, you can trivially verify this yourself just by looking at /newest.
> the account was brand new when they were posted so they were probably killed by the spam detector
Re: Lions OS: secure – fast – adaptable
#57Can anyone elaborate which (proposed) advantages LionsOS has over Genode?
Re: Lions OS: secure – fast – adaptable
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been waiting for a system like this for over a decade to use as my daily driver. An OS that runs with a capability model like this is immune to whole classes of security exploits that guarantee Linux, Windows, MacOS, etc. will never be secure. I was hoping Genode would get there sooner, and GNU Hurd should have gotten there years ago. Capabilities are the computing version of circuit breakers. They make it possi…
Do you know if there is anything like that which can run OCI containers/lightweight VMs? I would love that as daily driver too for the same reasons, but realistically will have to run various Linux apps to be productive, so those could go into shortlived isolated sandboxes ala distrobox.
Re: Lions OS: secure – fast – adaptable
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you know if there is anything like that which can run OCI containers/lightweight VMs? I would love that as daily driver too for the same reasons, but realistically will have to run various Linux apps to be productive, so those could go into shortlived isolated sandboxes ala distrobox.
Have tried Qubes? It provides security through isolated VMs. https://qubes-os.org
A replacement with a more serious architecture based on seL4 is in the works[0].
Re: Lions OS: secure – fast – adaptable
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been waiting for a system like this for over a decade to use as my daily driver. An OS that runs with a capability model like this is immune to whole classes of security exploits that guarantee Linux, Windows, MacOS, etc. will never be secure. I was hoping Genode would get there sooner, and GNU Hurd should have gotten there years ago. Capabilities are the computing version of circuit breakers. They make it possi…
Have you tried Genode's Sculpt OS? "Sculpt is an open-source general-purpose OS. It combines Genode's microkernel architecture, capability-based security, sandboxed device drivers, and virtual machines in a novel operating system for commodity PC hardware and the PinePhone. Sculpt is used as day-to-day OS by the Genode developers." https://genode.org/download/sculpt
I'm hoping that Sculpt 24.04 does the job for me. If I can make sense of it enough to get Free Pascal running on it, or even just a C compiler, and "Hello, World" in a CLI, we're off to the races.