Live data from Hacker News

With Eye On Future, Billionaire Investor Bets On Paul

npr.org

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: With Eye On Future, Billionaire Investor Bets On Paul

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As an engineer myself, this quote illustrates Thiel's ignorance of engineering progress over the past 40 years, and his disregard for the risks posed by industrial-scale experiments on the general public. People like him are precisely why we need environmental regulations in the first place, instead of simply relying on people's common sense and prudence.

You are assuming that those regulations lead to a better outcome. This is not very likely given that the amount of issues the world is facing is not going to be solved by alternative energy as we know it, nor by ignoring the very essence of progress. Reality don't care what way we do thing. It will judge us by our ability to survive whatever it throws at us. Whether that is astroids hitting earth, lack of resources o…

You are assuming that those regulations lead to a better outcome.

I'm satisfied by the evidence that they do. We don't have nearly the lead in our bodies that we did in the heyday of lead fuel additives, we don't have asbestos dust permeating our schools, and the ozone hole is shrinking. All of these positive outcomes were the result of regulation.

[Reality] will judge us by our ability to survive whatever it throws at us.

Or whatever we throw at us. The US has an obesity epidemic costing us billions in health care and lost productivity, and it is a problem entirely of our own making.

The engineering progress over the past 40 years have primarily been piggybacking on the 60 years that came before.

This is always true, whatever time period you look at. And looking at the history of technological progress objectively, it is simply absurd to maintain that it is slower now than it was 40 years ago.

Re: With Eye On Future, Billionaire Investor Bets On Paul

#52
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Contrary to your point, the 19th century was a deflationary period and there was massive wealth creation and innovation. Inflation is not and was never a lubricant for social mobility.

There was tremendous wealth concentration, ultimately leading to the New Deal and Federal Reserve.

The New Deal had absolutely nothing to do with the late Victorian period (or the 19th century.) The New Deal was a reaction to the Great Depression.

There was indeed great wealth concentration in the 19th century, but there was also a massive amount of wealth creation that benefited more than just the very wealthy.

The Federal Reserve had little to do with the concentration of wealth. The Federal Reserve was the culmination of decades of lobbying to bring back a central bank the U.S.

Post reply on HN