I find this hard to accept. Doesn't Apple do pre-release testing of their updates? How the release process looks like? News like these are the major reason why I apply updates only after long periods of waiting if anything blows up for others. Why companies use their userbase as testers?
> News like these are the major reason why I apply updates only after long periods of waiting if anything blows up for others. But then you are accepting that you are running an exploitable OS since you are lacking the latest security fixes. Not sure if that‘s an acceptable tradeoff.
macOS Sonoma 14.4 might break Java on your machine
51–60 of 271 posts
Re: macOS Sonoma 14.4 might break Java on your machine
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
FTFA: > The issue was not present in the early access releases for macOS 14.4, so it was discovered only after Apple released the update. There were some security fixes that were marked as under active exploitation in macOS 14.4, so my money is on those landing very steep close to the release date and this being fallout from that.
FTBR: "It is also successful on the previous versions of Sonoma" (no mention of EA) "It could not be reproduced on 23-ea+13, 22+36-2370" (EA versions of Java)
It’s possible that Java was doing something very weird, maybe undocumented/unsupported; but it’s not clear how this is anything other than Apple making a change (which I don’t see documented in their release notes) and breaking users.
Re: macOS Sonoma 14.4 might break Java on your machine
#53I'm on 14.4 and using Jetbrain's IDE. So -this- is the reason my IDE randomly crashes. I'd been chalking it up to 14.4 but didn't have any specifics. It's mostly fine, though. The crashes are rare, and since everything auto-saves, you're not really losing anything. It's just an "oh, okay." moment. Obviously it'll be good when it's fixed, but on my personal list of impactful bugs, this doesn't crack the top 10.
Re: macOS Sonoma 14.4 might break Java on your machine
#54Re: macOS Sonoma 14.4 might break Java on your machine
#55This is why most enterprise workplace tech teams don’t roll out any OS level updates immediately. Regardless of whether they are on windows or macOS. Also a good idea to disable automatic updates on all devices that you use daily.
Re: macOS Sonoma 14.4 might break Java on your machine
#56Been saying this for as long as I’ve been using macOS: it is not a developer friendly OS and am close to the conclusion that this reputation is a psy-op. Yeah it’s pretty, it mostly works when the box is first turned on and the hardware is unmatched but macOS itself is actually subpar. QA seems second tier, things you’d except from other OSes like, I don’t know, using a third party second display are just bad experie…
Re: macOS Sonoma 14.4 might break Java on your machine
#57I find it difficult to imagine how a change like this (sending a SIGKILL to the process instead of SIGSEGV on a page fault) can be done in the final release and not in one of the EA releases or betas. It is clearly a breaking change with no easy workaround (since SIGKILL cannot be caught), for a behaviour which is well defined by POSIX. Even if you momentarily ignore the reasons why someone thought this could be a go…
Re: macOS Sonoma 14.4 might break Java on your machine
#58Been saying this for as long as I’ve been using macOS: it is not a developer friendly OS and am close to the conclusion that this reputation is a psy-op. Yeah it’s pretty, it mostly works when the box is first turned on and the hardware is unmatched but macOS itself is actually subpar. QA seems second tier, things you’d except from other OSes like, I don’t know, using a third party second display are just bad experie…
Re: macOS Sonoma 14.4 might break Java on your machine
#59Been saying this for as long as I’ve been using macOS: it is not a developer friendly OS and am close to the conclusion that this reputation is a psy-op. Yeah it’s pretty, it mostly works when the box is first turned on and the hardware is unmatched but macOS itself is actually subpar. QA seems second tier, things you’d except from other OSes like, I don’t know, using a third party second display are just bad experie…
As of recently, Docker on MacOS has improved and AFAICT the performance penalty is gone. Is the problematic corporate Mac an M-series Mac or Intel? M-series have been great in my experience. I did used to get random full system crashes on Intel Macs which haven't happened in a few years on M1/M2.
Re: macOS Sonoma 14.4 might break Java on your machine
#60> As a normal part of the just-in-time compile and execute cycle, processes running on macOS may access memory in protected memory regions. Prior to the macOS 14.4 update, in certain circumstances, the macOS kernel would respond to these protected memory accesses by sending a signal, SIGBUS or SIGSEGV, to the process. > With macOS 14.4, when a thread is operating in the write mode, if a memory access to a protected m…
> What is bizarre to me is that Oracle relied on receiving SIGSEGV as normal mode of operation. That should have been a hint where things are going, no? Not bizarre at all, this how the runtime has always operated, as anyone one who's ever attached a debugger to a Java process knows. The SIGSEGV handler is also responsible to handling NullPointerExceptions IIRC.
> ... the JVM can intercept the resulting SIGSEGV ("Signal: Segmentation Fault"), look at the return address for that signal, and figure out where that access was made in the generated code. Once it figures that bit out, it can then know where to dispatch the control to handle this case — in most cases, throwing NullPointerException or branching somewhere.
https://shipilev.net/jvm/anatomy-quarks/25-implicit-null-che...