Earlier quoted context omitted.
As far as I know there aren’t any sports which are completely safe and without side effects. Sport can ruin your joints (eg. running), spine (eg. weightlifting) and cause plethora of other health issues (anecdotally I know many people who got serious injuries from while leisurely playing team games). Usually there’s net gain from those activities, and what sport one practices vastly depends on preference and I’d rath…
Cycling is better for the joints than running. Unfortunately, bicycles are so damned effective that you have to cycle for a lot longer to burn the same amount of calories as when running...
Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat concussions
51–60 of 108 posts
Re: Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat concussions
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not? Because without animals you wouldn't be here today. We're only here today because animals have given us the resources to survive. From cavemen hunting for meat to bees, insects pollinating plants. The only resource we can provide is limited breast milk, sperm and meat. But human meat is deemed socially unacceptable, sperm only exists within biological males and the biological women has a limited timespan in…
> Humans are not important, we are a fault to this world. No other plant or animal is important either. Nature doesn't give a shit about any of us. The ability to actually care about abstract concepts like the suffering of others is a rare trait in the animal kingdom. Humans have it. Maybe some primates and cetaceans have it. Otherwise animals are quite content to rip each other apart in the most cruel ways possible…
> Humans are not important, we are a fault to this world.
> This alone makes human a little special, no?
No, not really. We build militant armies only to send them off to fight so we can cause brutality to the same race for all but nothing other than evil and greed.
At least animals are mauling in for survival. You could say power too but at least they eat the remains.
Re: Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat concussions
#53Maybe someday there will be a drug that protects brains before suffering repeat concussions
> Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat concussions
"brains get damage after repeat concussions"
"novel drug could protect brains against that"
Re: Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat concussions
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
A human life is worth an infinite amount of animal lives.
Said the human, apparently blithely unaware and certainly dismissive of any possible bias. The infinite animals, on the other end, made no such genocidal claims. In fact, on the whole, they were about 100% less fond of ethnic cleansing than the hairless apes. Not satisfied with continuing their perverse murder of the biosphere, the apes regularly turned on their own also, inventing ever-more horrifying methods of doi…
Re: Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat concussions
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Humans are not important, we are a fault to this world. No other plant or animal is important either. Nature doesn't give a shit about any of us. The ability to actually care about abstract concepts like the suffering of others is a rare trait in the animal kingdom. Humans have it. Maybe some primates and cetaceans have it. Otherwise animals are quite content to rip each other apart in the most cruel ways possible…
I removed that statement but: > Humans are not important, we are a fault to this world. > This alone makes human a little special, no? No, not really. We build militant armies only to send them off to fight so we can cause brutality to the same race for all but nothing other than evil and greed. At least animals are mauling in for survival. You could say power too but at least they eat the remains.
Re: Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat concussions
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
A human life is worth an infinite amount of animal lives.
Said the human, apparently blithely unaware and certainly dismissive of any possible bias. The infinite animals, on the other end, made no such genocidal claims. In fact, on the whole, they were about 100% less fond of ethnic cleansing than the hairless apes. Not satisfied with continuing their perverse murder of the biosphere, the apes regularly turned on their own also, inventing ever-more horrifying methods of doi…
Re: Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat concussions
#57> A 54-g metal (tungsten) bolt was used to deliver an impact to the dorsal aspect of the skull, resulting in a rotational acceleration of the head through the Kimwipe. Mice underwent seven repetitive less-than-mild injuries (rlmTBI, 24-inch height; W/5 mm flat) OR repetitive mild injuries (rmTBI, 36-inch height; W/5 mm flat) in 9 days. This seems very cruel, even in the face of progress. The price that animals pay fo…
I'd take it further, in my opinion, it is essentially unjustifiable in a deeply karmic way. I genuinely think that I would be able to work on a weapons guidance system and even know that it has been used to target a military vehicle without feeling much guilt but performing the kind of work you have quoted on animals would make me stop and think. And just stop. It is not worth the progress. Not worth the credits, the…
Re: Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat concussions
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Because we humans are more important than them. This seems to be self evident to you. Can you explain why this is true?
There is actually no completely objective way in which it’s possible to determine the relative importance or sacredness of an individual’s life between one species and another. There is no particularly good objective reason for me to value my neighbours life more than a fish. However I choose to be an unabashed specieist and value any individual human life above any individual other life.
Re: Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat concussions
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Said the human, apparently blithely unaware and certainly dismissive of any possible bias. The infinite animals, on the other end, made no such genocidal claims. In fact, on the whole, they were about 100% less fond of ethnic cleansing than the hairless apes. Not satisfied with continuing their perverse murder of the biosphere, the apes regularly turned on their own also, inventing ever-more horrifying methods of doi…
Is it genocide if you breed more of them than you put down?
Re: Novel drug could protect brains from damage after repeat concussions
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
And that makes it all okay? Still insanely cruel. Would you volunteer to be anaesthetised and then have your head bashed in multiple times? No? Why should animals.
Because we humans are more important than them. I don’t understand the issue. We should try to minimize the pain and suffering of these test subjects, in a few decades I am sure we will have better alternatives…
The profoundly unaware speciesism and selfishness in this comment is exactly why there is so much suffering and pain in this world.