Live data from Hacker News

Flowblade: Open-source video editor for Linux

jliljebl.github.io

51–60 of 93 posts

Re: Flowblade: Open-source video editor for Linux

#51

I saw this post hours after I finished a task where this would have come in handy. I had a bunch of HQ video clips from a professional Sony video camera that I needed to string together, with short simple fade transitions. The last time I did this(few years ago), I was using a Mac, and iMovie did the job well. This time, I was on a Windows NUC, and figured Windows MovieMaker should do the trick. Nope. - Opening Movie…

Kdenlive has been my best FOSS NLE experience

Re: Flowblade: Open-source video editor for Linux

#52

Davinci Resolve works on Win, Mac and Linux . Switching to it from Adobe's Premier and Aftereffects was the best decision I've made. Oh, and it's free (not the Studio version).

Please share with us the details. What is great about it? I do believe that Resolve is not open source, correct? That's not an issue for me but it could be for others.

I sometimes edit videos for a raptor conservation charity. I found Resolve to be great for standard tasks such as creating videos from multiple input clips, trimming / fading / transitioning and editing out bloopers. It was also excellent for audio editing, e.g. getting rid of background wind noise, etc.

Some of its built-in tools are quite sophisticated, e.g. setting up key frames that follow a moving object (a bird in this case), and then adding tracking 'targeting graticules' or changing orientation from landscape to vertical (i.e. for mobile), but dynamically changing the screen clipping coords so that a bird flying across the landscape view remains central when converted to vertical.

This was all with the free version. I've some prior experience with video editing software so the learning curve wasn't too bad. I did watch some of DaVinci's tutorials to understand the basic conventions, e.g. around the major tool modes, use of the node-graph editor for assembling effects, etc.

Re: Flowblade: Open-source video editor for Linux

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Both are horrible and will crash and you will never finish your project. Just use Resolve and get work done.

You are correct. Kdenlive crashes all the time here.

Weird, it's never crashed on me and I use it extensively.

Re: Flowblade: Open-source video editor for Linux

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Both are horrible and will crash and you will never finish your project. Just use Resolve and get work done.

Adding one datapoint here: I made several projects with Shotcut and am glad it exists, but I had to learn to expect a crash and work defensively; That's how often it happened. The most usual crash was while moving clips around, the application died and the window closed, work lost.

I recently used Shotcut and it did crash a few times, but both times it still had my changes after reopening.

Not being used to the concepts of video editing, I found it easy to find a workflow that worked for me (cutting out mistakes and stitching remaining ends).

Re: Flowblade: Open-source video editor for Linux

#56

I saw this post hours after I finished a task where this would have come in handy. I had a bunch of HQ video clips from a professional Sony video camera that I needed to string together, with short simple fade transitions. The last time I did this(few years ago), I was using a Mac, and iMovie did the job well. This time, I was on a Windows NUC, and figured Windows MovieMaker should do the trick. Nope. - Opening Movie…

Blender is a great video editor as well.

Re: Flowblade: Open-source video editor for Linux

#57

Davinci Resolve works on Win, Mac and Linux . Switching to it from Adobe's Premier and Aftereffects was the best decision I've made. Oh, and it's free (not the Studio version).

Please share with us the details. What is great about it? I do believe that Resolve is not open source, correct? That's not an issue for me but it could be for others.

Resolve has a all-in-one approach to movie making: it has a NLE (copy/paste/trim/arrange video clip), a very advanced color grading tool (in fact it was born as one), an audio editor (née Fairlight), and even a compositor (née Fusion).

All of those components are production-ready, free (as in beer), have a dedicated team working on the product. Plus, the parent company seems in very good health and doesn't seems to make stupid decision (probably because they're making most of their money on hardware ?)/

Re: Flowblade: Open-source video editor for Linux

#58

I saw this post hours after I finished a task where this would have come in handy. I had a bunch of HQ video clips from a professional Sony video camera that I needed to string together, with short simple fade transitions. The last time I did this(few years ago), I was using a Mac, and iMovie did the job well. This time, I was on a Windows NUC, and figured Windows MovieMaker should do the trick. Nope. - Opening Movie…

Also to consider: CapCut. Although I don't know if it handles 10 bit.

Re: Flowblade: Open-source video editor for Linux

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the best one that I've found for Windows, despite the somewhat infrequent crashes.

[flagged]

Listen, buddy, if I followed this advice, I wouldn't be able to use any software. As a matter of fact, Kdenlive is actually one of the better behaved tools in my toolbox. Nothing's perfect, but at least there are almost always reasonable workarounds (like saving your work early and often).

Re: Flowblade: Open-source video editor for Linux

#60

I saw this post hours after I finished a task where this would have come in handy. I had a bunch of HQ video clips from a professional Sony video camera that I needed to string together, with short simple fade transitions. The last time I did this(few years ago), I was using a Mac, and iMovie did the job well. This time, I was on a Windows NUC, and figured Windows MovieMaker should do the trick. Nope. - Opening Movie…

I would say for amateur video editing, that DaVinci Resolve free edition is ideal candidate, you can go quite in-depth, or just drag & drop and add some transitions; previously I used imovie on mac too (even build a hackintosh first and bought imovie license $12) but it does not add that small extra that was needed.

once I started working with DaVinci.. game changer, from start to finish, with some advanced motion tracking, title overlays, in less than a few hours. Upside is also that there are plenty of tutorials available for DaVinci, from beginner to advanced

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve/edi...

Post reply on HN