Earlier quoted context omitted.
And? They have a right to do so. In particular, they have a right to defederate any server for any reasons - which includes mine, yours, or this other person's, with or without asking things like "block X or I'll block you".
Isn't that a bit like saying a gold prospector has a right to shoot anybody in the whole Wild West, all because he can?
Threads is blocking servers on the Fediverse. Here's how we unblocked ourselves.
51–60 of 67 posts
Re: Threads is blocking servers on the Fediverse. Here's how we unblocked ourselves.
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't that a bit like saying a gold prospector has a right to shoot anybody in the whole Wild West, all because he can?
Equating murder, even attempted, with defederation - this is a fallacy.
Re: Threads is blocking servers on the Fediverse. Here's how we unblocked ourselves.
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Again it doesn't really matter because it's just the way it works, but it's also a feature for server admins. Imagine being harassed by someone, or imagine that person harassing your users, blah blah blah. Is there some hypothetical where this feature is abused in a super petty way? Sure. Welcome to all features in all software.
Let's take a gun as an example. You could use it to shoot a bad guy, but there are a lot of times where the person who got shot was a good guy, and a lot of other times it's by accident. The same goes for moderation - you can justify handing out the power to cut off connections between entire communities to random people by thinking of the ways it could be used for good but it doesn't get you out of dealing with the…
Re: Threads is blocking servers on the Fediverse. Here's how we unblocked ourselves.
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Equating murder, even attempted, with defederation - this is a fallacy.
The only way for the analogy to hold no water at all would be for bans and deceleration to not harm anyone; that's not true in many cases.
Re: Threads is blocking servers on the Fediverse. Here's how we unblocked ourselves.
#55In case the author doesn't know or willfully didn't post the reason Spinster is banned both on Threads and Mastadon; the server is a safe haven for TERFs who co-opt feminism as the cover for open seething transphobia disguised as criticism when communicating to a wider audience. Credit where it's due they're much smarter than your typical bigots and know how to hide it better to avoid bans. The fact that the OP is ou…
Re: Threads is blocking servers on the Fediverse. Here's how we unblocked ourselves.
#56It's an odd omission that the "feminist server" mentioned is actually a gathering place for TERFs, after they were banned from places like Reddit. If your community is problematic enough to be kicked off of Reddit , I can imagine your users/content may not be desirable to Meta/Threads' brand, either.
Re: Threads is blocking servers on the Fediverse. Here's how we unblocked ourselves.
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
> First, unless users spend a lot of time talking about servers, they won't know where to leave to. You can literally see everyone's instance right next to their name on most Fediverse clients - I'm Michał "phoe" Herda, but also @phoe@functional.cafe, which already gives people one more possibility to choose from as long as they see my posts pop up. Then, there's some independent instance browsers, and, finally, you…
I think you hit the nail on the head when you said finding a server with rational administration is not cheap. The competition - for those who can tolerate one-liner Twitter culture - is free.
Sure it is: choose the server everyone else chose. We know exactly how all this stuff works out because we already hashed it out with email. Everyone will just use the equivalent of Gmail and you'll have to do what they say or they won't deliver your emails/posts.
Nilay Patel was right when he said the essential product of social media is content moderation (or a spam filter, whatever you want to call it). Some service will come along and say "we filter out 100% of the stuff 80% of you don't want" and that'll be that. Services/protocols that don't facilitate that will be replaced by those that do. Maybe it's hard to see now, but we're in the "overthrow our tyrannical overlords" phase of the internet cycle. Next up is "please someone make this safe/usable for mere mortals". Centralization etc. is a red herring.
Re: Threads is blocking servers on the Fediverse. Here's how we unblocked ourselves.
#58In case the author doesn't know or willfully didn't post the reason Spinster is banned both on Threads and Mastadon; the server is a safe haven for TERFs who co-opt feminism as the cover for open seething transphobia disguised as criticism when communicating to a wider audience. Credit where it's due they're much smarter than your typical bigots and know how to hide it better to avoid bans. The fact that the OP is ou…
Re: Threads is blocking servers on the Fediverse. Here's how we unblocked ourselves.
#59Re: Threads is blocking servers on the Fediverse. Here's how we unblocked ourselves.
#60It's an odd omission that the "feminist server" mentioned is actually a gathering place for TERFs, after they were banned from places like Reddit. If your community is problematic enough to be kicked off of Reddit , I can imagine your users/content may not be desirable to Meta/Threads' brand, either.