> Found 218 paths with 3 degrees of separation from Adolf Hitler to Wet T-shirt contest in 54.73 seconds! Finally we know!
Lambda Calculus -> Lorena Bobbitt was 4 degrees. I feel like the existence of pages like "List of notable people from Buffalo, NY" are sort of cheating this sort of thing.
Six Degrees of Wikipedia
51–60 of 78 posts
Re: Six Degrees of Wikipedia
#52Interesting. I wonder what are the two most separated pages, i.e. pages with the longest path connecting them.
However, Wikipedia also has "islands" of pages which cannot be clicked out of to other islands.
Re: Six Degrees of Wikipedia
#53Re: Six Degrees of Wikipedia
#54Looks like the data is a little outdated.
Re: Six Degrees of Wikipedia
#55Re: Six Degrees of Wikipedia
#56Creator here. Glad that HN rediscovered my old side project. All the code is freely available on GitHub [1]. It's running on a tiny f1-micro GCE instance which is currently down due to the traffic. I don't have time to fix it right now, but it should resolve itself once traffic dies down. The data source is also several years out of date at this point, so the links it returns may not match current reality. Other than…
Re: Six Degrees of Wikipedia
#57Creator here. Glad that HN rediscovered my old side project. All the code is freely available on GitHub [1]. It's running on a tiny f1-micro GCE instance which is currently down due to the traffic. I don't have time to fix it right now, but it should resolve itself once traffic dies down. The data source is also several years out of date at this point, so the links it returns may not match current reality. Other than…
Re: Six Degrees of Wikipedia
#58Re: Six Degrees of Wikipedia
#59Re: Six Degrees of Wikipedia
#60Creator here. Glad that HN rediscovered my old side project. All the code is freely available on GitHub [1]. It's running on a tiny f1-micro GCE instance which is currently down due to the traffic. I don't have time to fix it right now, but it should resolve itself once traffic dies down. The data source is also several years out of date at this point, so the links it returns may not match current reality. Other than…
It's interesting to see you now pitching it as an "AI email app". If it's actually working you to gain more traction than may be it's worth riding the wave but please don't loose focus. It was not meant to be an AI first email app, it was a better Google Inbox, a better email client.