Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's just one of the usual cycles. Enough time has gone by that most people have forgotten (or weren't alive) during the last server era. They aren't fresh on what the serious downsides of it are, or why the PC revolution was such a step forward. But people will be reminded (lots are already beginning to see) and the pendulum will swing back away from using someone else's server. Then after a couple decades, the pend…
Could someone who remember the era of mainframe computing, which of the downsides could apply to the modern version of it (cloud desktop)?
Also, communications can and do suffer interruptions, and if you're using a remote server then such interruptions can be problematic.
My point isn't that "the cloud" is a bad model, though. It's that it involves a different set of risks and tradeoffs. For a given use case, "cloud" may be the best solution. For others, it won't be.