Live data from Hacker News

F*** Paywalls

1ft.io

51–60 of 92 posts

Re: F*** Paywalls

#51

Doesn't work for most stuff anymore either. I've been using this after archive.ph became captcha hell and 12ft.io got blocked

For all of 12ft.io’s bluster it seems that they turn it off politely if the target site asks which means it doesn’t accomplish anything at all. Archive.ph needs to do something about the CAPTCHAs but maybe that is what they have to to shed load so they can afford to run it.

> turn it off politely

Cease and desists strike again!

Re: F*** Paywalls

#52
Jeff Johnson's stopthescript and stopthemadness safari plugin for ios and mac os bypasses most paywalls and actually disables javascript. Inline included.

Re: F*** Paywalls

#53

Here's a thought... Why not let the paying subscribers promote content they especially like to the commons? So, if you're a paying member, you get to read everything like it works today. But you also get a steady flow of tips. If you like an article, you can tip the author directly, which comes out of your monthly subscription. Once a given article gets enough tips, it's permanently unlocked for every visitor. Basica…

You’re making people pay to see the non-quality content. And curate.

Re: F*** Paywalls

#54

We don't want to pay and we don't want to watch ads - still, we want to consume the content. I mean, I get the sentiment, I also share it to a great degree. But how are websites supposed to stay afloat?

If you make one solution impossible, another one pops up.

Re: F*** Paywalls

#55
post #19

lol what do people expect? You say you want a web without ads, now you want a web without paywalls. Sorry, but... pick one. Or watch as the internet collapses.

The internet will also collapse when everything has turned into ad-optimized clickbait. There is no shortage of brilliant people who are happy to share their creative work for free. Remember blogs and RSS? They were great. Static pages don't cost anything to host either. I reject your false choice.

Why happened to blogs and RSS?

Re: F*** Paywalls

#56

We don't want to pay and we don't want to watch ads - still, we want to consume the content. I mean, I get the sentiment, I also share it to a great degree. But how are websites supposed to stay afloat?

>how are websites supposed to stay afloat?

They're not. If no one wants to pay for it then it's not supposed to exist, speaking in terms of how the capitalist system is supposed to work

Re: F*** Paywalls

#57
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The fundamental problem is that you can't unread an article if you don't like it, and get your money back.

Usually you can't refund your meals in restaurants. Maybe if you insist they will let you, but it's very... Karen.

In a restaurant you have a pretty good idea what you will get, generally.

Also the analogy is flawed because many people will stick to a few different meals they like from a restaurant. This would make no sense at all for information/articles.

Re: F*** Paywalls

#59

20 years of World Wide Web and we still don't have micropayments so we can just pay a penny to read an article. Why does it take us so long?

I'm still trying to get reimbursement for the first 20 years of my life watching shitty commercials having grown up in the 70's.

Re: F*** Paywalls

#60

20 years of World Wide Web and we still don't have micropayments so we can just pay a penny to read an article. Why does it take us so long?

Because all payment processors want 2% + 0.x per transaction.

Which is why you need either a roll-up system, or pre-payment.
Post reply on HN