Live data from Hacker News

Waymo says insurance data shows its driverless cars are safer than humans

nbcbayarea.com

51–60 of 288 posts

Re: Waymo says insurance data shows its driverless cars are safer than humans

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you are comparing insurance rates then you are already comparing a similar area. If insurance companies would give you a discount if your car had self driving enabled that seems like a pretty sure fire guarantee that self driving is better.

Cheaper != safer or better... But at least it's observable

In case of insurance it does mean 'expected to be safer'.

Re: Waymo says insurance data shows its driverless cars are safer than humans

#52

Those news should be carefully regulated. After working for 2 years in the field as an engineering manager directly responsible in getting good numbers, none of the claims of the time were genuine, but were just framed in a way that provided the best outlook. I wonder if it’s still the case.

You forgot the number came from the insurance industry directly, who will bear the blunt cost if their calculations are wrong. So alone due to their self-interest, I believe those numbers are solid.

Re: Waymo says insurance data shows its driverless cars are safer than humans

#53
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Plus they have a fleet of support folks and standby remote and dispatchable operators which cannot be cheap, we get no insight into the financials except that they're losing several billion dollars a year. If at the end you end up paying more than for a Uber for the service to be sustainable then what's the point. I think they are banking on the technology continuing to improve, the number of manual interventions d…

Great to hear someone is still pursuing the Uber model long after Uber themselves gave up on it!

I thought the problem with Uber’s self-driving initiative was that they didn’t know what they were doing, except for the main guy who stole the IP from Google.

Re: Waymo says insurance data shows its driverless cars are safer than humans

#54

As discussed in the other recent thread, the self-driving industry loves to frame the question this way - How safe are they compared to human drivers? Their consistency and the energy they put into it should indicate how intentional and strategic it is. To understand it, don't be swept along by their framing. Sophisticated communicators - and we can be certain that these businesses have hired some of them - as well a…

Why did you type three paragraphs of nothing? What is the 'correct' way to frame this question?

Re: Waymo says insurance data shows its driverless cars are safer than humans

#56
post #5

Been a flurry of self driving car safety news lately. Both Cruise and Waymo are reaching for more sophisticated comparison samples than nationwide stats to demonstrate the safety of their systems. But the obvious way to prove this, to me anyway, is to run a randomized controlled trial. Put them in a dispatch system with human driven cars, randomize whether any given assignment goes to a human or a robot, and you've g…

I believe Waymo cars are now part of the Uber network. So hopefully soon that data should be available. Hopefully it is released.

https://waymo.com/blog/2023/05/waymo-and-uber-partner-to-bri...

Re: Waymo says insurance data shows its driverless cars are safer than humans

#57
post #4

Aren't they operating under a lot of constraints? The comparison should be with human drivers operating under similar conditions and on similar roads, similar cars(eg. new ones), weather conditions etc. Plus they have a fleet of support folks and standby remote and dispatchable operators which cannot be cheap, we get no insight into the financials except that they're losing several billion dollars a year. If at the e…

"The comparison should be with human drivers operating under similar conditions and on similar roads, similar cars(eg. new ones), weather conditions etc."

It is my guess only, but a significant difference would be that robots cannot get drunk, don't drive in a sleep-deprived state and don't get distracted by texting at the wheel.

Re: Waymo says insurance data shows its driverless cars are safer than humans

#58

I'd never really thought about it, but in a capitalist society like the US, this is how you really determine how safe something is: how much does it cost to insure?

I don’t see why not. You are outsourcing the question to an organization dedicated to judging risks.

Re: Waymo says insurance data shows its driverless cars are safer than humans

#59
post #54

As discussed in the other recent thread, the self-driving industry loves to frame the question this way - How safe are they compared to human drivers? Their consistency and the energy they put into it should indicate how intentional and strategic it is. To understand it, don't be swept along by their framing. Sophisticated communicators - and we can be certain that these businesses have hired some of them - as well a…

Why did you type three paragraphs of nothing? What is the 'correct' way to frame this question?

The correct way is "who goes to jail if a driverless car kills a child?"

Re: Waymo says insurance data shows its driverless cars are safer than humans

#60
post #4

Aren't they operating under a lot of constraints? The comparison should be with human drivers operating under similar conditions and on similar roads, similar cars(eg. new ones), weather conditions etc. Plus they have a fleet of support folks and standby remote and dispatchable operators which cannot be cheap, we get no insight into the financials except that they're losing several billion dollars a year. If at the e…

I believe for the insurance purposes, this difference is irrelevant. The point is under the current condition, Waymo driverless cars are safer than human controlled cars, thus the question of liability and permit to operate should be cleared. The question whether humans are truly inferior to robots in term of controlling cars is rather a question of ego than a practical one.

If you had insurance for a human whose vehicle could only operate between 9pm to 6am, would it still be more expensive than Waymo's?
Post reply on HN