Earlier quoted context omitted.
FTFY: English does not need a second conflicting definition for the second.
I second that statement.
Metric Time
51–60 of 343 posts
Re: Metric Time
#52thought as, a 10x10 clock, metric because 10 hr dial, has 100 mins every hour. it is sort of ok, but number of hours reduced from 12 to 10, that is counting 4 less hours everyday, means trouble and 100 mins every hr though --- in total a 10x10 clock is 'difficulty'.
a 20 hr dial, on the other hand --- dose it solve?
somewhere i though of a 16 hr display too.
Faisal
Re: Metric Time
#53With metric hours, I'd hope 1-classical-hour meetings wouldn't become 1-metric-hour meetings because that's what we did in the past ;)
Re: Metric Time
#54Personally, I prefer 100 metric hours in a day. Each centiday is about 15 minutes. Each milliday is about 90 seconds. And a microday is slightly shorter than a second. But, sadly, this revolution won't occur until after I'm elected God-Emperor of Mars, so it is all rather academic.
You have my vote!
Re: Metric Time
#55On the likelihood something like this might be considered, dont hold you breath. Our continuing use of Babylonian time is probably the most pervasive and enduring network effect known to humanity.
Re: Metric Time
#56You could call this lots of things, but you shouldn’t call it “metric” because its second is not a metric second. In the SI (metric) system, the second is one of the fundamental units. The world does not need a conflicting definition for the second. As someone who’s implemented a date and time library, the real pain is in dates, leap seconds and time zone transitions. 86,400 seconds in a day is a relative piece of ca…
You are right of course but also keep in mind that, and that is just my thoughts after reading, is that the French tried to implement decimal time along with the rest of what we call the metric system in the 18th century. And it was the only system people rejected. So I think the author named everything metric to make the point that if it would be part of the system a metric second would be … long. But again I could…
Re: Metric Time
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
And 12 divides into 2, 3, 4 and 6. Base 12 is far superior to base 10. Those Babylonians weren’t stupid.
Also, while we have 10 fingers, we have 12 finger segments to count with (disregarding the thumb): https://www.earthdate.org/episodes/how-10-fingers-became-12-...
Re: Metric Time
#58I always preferred Internet Time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time
Re: Metric Time
#59You could call this lots of things, but you shouldn’t call it “metric” because its second is not a metric second. In the SI (metric) system, the second is one of the fundamental units. The world does not need a conflicting definition for the second. As someone who’s implemented a date and time library, the real pain is in dates, leap seconds and time zone transitions. 86,400 seconds in a day is a relative piece of ca…
Is celsius metric?
Kelvin is the base unit of temperature; Celsius is a derived unit.
Re: Metric Time
#60I'm really fascinated by such ideas. However, it's just academic as time is so much baked into physical devices (watches, clocks, ...) so this will most probably never happen. I'd rather start redoing the calendar. It doesn't need to be metric but the different lengths of the months (and the naming Oct. should be 8 not 10?) could be reworked.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_reform
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Calendar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry454
and ideas for time keeping on other planets like