Live data from Hacker News

What's the case for naturally mined diamonds anymore?

ft.com

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: What's the case for naturally mined diamonds anymore?

#51
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a red flag for the relationship right there. If "not wasting money" is a core value for you, but "status" is more important for your partner, things will go sour sooner or later. Of course it's very difficult to be rational in limerence.

Seeking high social status in a male partner is a good reproductive strategy for human females. That’s why so many women like Veblen goods and why ugly billionaires have gorgeous wives. Pretending that normal human behaviour is a “red flag” is a path towards conflict and unhappiness. Sure, you can find outliers that don’t care about such things, but not everyone can marry only a minority of women.

>Seeking high social status in a male partner is a good reproductive strategy for human females.

So is taking them for a ride, getting half of their assets and house, and having relationships and babies with other man.

So?

>Sure, you can find outliers that don’t care about such things, but not everyone can marry only a minority of women.

No, but a huge majority can be divorsed at 40, paying alimony, losing half their assets, and wondering why they listened to stupid advice based on "normal human behaviour" and "good reproductive strategies".

Funny also how this "normal human behaviour" and "good reproductive strategies" it's just manifested in the form of a demand for an expensive rock in the US, almost as it's a BS cultural thing and not some evolutionary standard.

No woman in this parts of Europe (and many others I know of) would care for such BS, unless she's the type that goes for older rich guys with expensive cars and yaughts too.

Re: What's the case for naturally mined diamonds anymore?

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gold, basically, but if it's not high enough carat the risk goes up a lot. At the same time, too high carat gold is going to get damaged very easily. It's a balancing act, you can only lower the risk.

What range?

I use 18k, with the normal ring design that has a thinner side towards the palm, counting on that thin part of the ring to break before a full degloving. I did ask about whether it was possible to get a 14k ring that came in two halves with 22k linkages between the halves (the idea being that it would split very easily in an emergency but most of the ring would be scratch resistant), but after looking at me like I had two heads one jeweller said it wasn't possible and the other jeweller quoted me some obscene price which, fair enough. Regardless, still remove the ring before you work with any tools that are a risk though, like a belt sander etc. If you use a workshop regularly, I would just build a designated container at a convenient height for your wedding ring, so you always know where it will be if it's not on your hand.
Post reply on HN