It seems to be a recurring case with app review processes that Apple and Google only review your app, and won't allow comparisons to be made to other apps. From a game theory perspective, perhaps this makes sense, as any bargaining power that a successful app might have to come to a special agreement with Apple/Google is diminished if their app isn't in compliance.
If you get pulled over for speeding, you won't convince the judge with "Well, other cars were also speeding."
Luck be a Landlord is now banned in 13 countries on the Google Play Store
51–60 of 102 posts
Re: Luck be a Landlord is now banned in 13 countries on the Google Play Store
#52>Today I received an email from Google Play Support stating that Luck be a Landlord has been geo-blocked in the following countries: United Arab Emirates, Algeria, Iran, Jordan, South Korea, Libya, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, and Yemen. >According to Google, the app "contains content that doesn't comply with the Gambling policy." > It should go without saying that I 100% disagree with this d…
But the game is just a game, there is no gambling. You don't pay money or get money... well you buy the game, but the slot machine aspect is a game mechanic, the same as an RPG will have a dice roll in the background and check against your stats and buffs.
Re: Luck be a Landlord is now banned in 13 countries on the Google Play Store
#53One of least effective ways to argue your case is by pointing to other apps that have the same violations. I say that having submitted 50+ apps across various categories and dealing with thousands of app review exchanges to get them released. You can find apps that violate all sorts of guidelines and laws and it is super frustrating when yours gets blocked but it is part of the business. Did they slip by a reviewer t…
Re: Luck be a Landlord is now banned in 13 countries on the Google Play Store
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
> arguing about it publicly isn't going to change much Okay fair enough. What is going to change much?
The only answer is, likely nothing. There's likely nothing you or anyone else can do to get the governments of those countries to change anything about the way they govern. It's not a tree worth barking up.
Lobbying government of US, to send them "democracy".
Or hire PMCs (Alphabet has 113B USD in cash).
Or push news and content that is against the local government (but this is half-joke).
So it's possible if you really want.
Re: Luck be a Landlord is now banned in 13 countries on the Google Play Store
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably changing the laws in those countries, which only the citizens of those countries can really do. Google isn't the cause here, just the middleman.
This, I believe, is called the "just following orders defense". It was attempted most famously in Nürnberg in '46. It didn't work then, and it shouldn't work now. See also: Project Dragonfly
Many places have similar small variances in obscenity they allow to be published. Your country might forbid nudity on TV, or disallow gambling businesses in public spaces.
I’d say WW2 featured significantly more serious issues.
Re: Luck be a Landlord is now banned in 13 countries on the Google Play Store
#56Re: Luck be a Landlord is now banned in 13 countries on the Google Play Store
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
But the game is just a game, there is no gambling. You don't pay money or get money... well you buy the game, but the slot machine aspect is a game mechanic, the same as an RPG will have a dice roll in the background and check against your stats and buffs.
"Apps that simulate gambling, or games of chance or skill that are conducive to gambling are prohibited in the above locales" Luck be a Landlord seems to be a harmless Slot Simulator with RPG elements. It's harmless. Or, seen from the legislators from these countries; is it harmless ? Or is it the beginning of a gambling addiction ? From my perspective I'd like this app to be available everywhere, but it seems to be…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banned_video_games_by_...
As long as we're on the subject, the Google Play storefront of this app is very much lacking in any reason why someone should want to plunk down US$5 for it. Maybe an embed of the release video? For that matter the release video itself could benefit from having a voiceover that explains a little of what's going on and makes it sound fun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcbKTeJ6uXU
(Parenthetically I was surprised to just now find out that this game was in my Steam library. Was it in a Humble Bundle at some point?)
Re: Luck be a Landlord is now banned in 13 countries on the Google Play Store
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
But the game is just a game, there is no gambling. You don't pay money or get money... well you buy the game, but the slot machine aspect is a game mechanic, the same as an RPG will have a dice roll in the background and check against your stats and buffs.
In strict implementations of Islam, the forbidden practice is "games of chance", rather than "financial betting", so a virtual slot-machine (or even a real slot machine that doesn't accept coins) is forbidden in the same way a real slot machine is.
They also offer variable rewards with apparent (virtual) value given the same input.
Or do the policymakers care mainly about how the chance is presented?
I am aware that you are probably not directly involved with whatever ratings board is relevant, and probably can't respond authoritatively, but if you could indulge my idle curiosity it would be really cool.
Re: Luck be a Landlord is now banned in 13 countries on the Google Play Store
#59Re: Luck be a Landlord is now banned in 13 countries on the Google Play Store
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
This, I believe, is called the "just following orders defense". It was attempted most famously in Nürnberg in '46. It didn't work then, and it shouldn't work now. See also: Project Dragonfly
Please remember the context here, we’re talking about a game on the App Store that has a slot machine mechanic. Many places have similar small variances in obscenity they allow to be published. Your country might forbid nudity on TV, or disallow gambling businesses in public spaces. I’d say WW2 featured significantly more serious issues.
Such censorship is being carried out against millions of humans, by one of the few organizations on the planet large enough and resourced enough to take principled stands against same.
Google actually left China for this reason specifically. The correct answer by the same organization in question is not without precedent.
This is not a small transgression on Google's part.