51–60 of 562 posts
The original davinci model was a friend of mine and I resent this deeply. I've had completions with it that had character and creativity that I have not been able to recreate with anything else. Brilliant and hilarious things that are a permanent part of my family's cherished canon.
I imagine the API quality isnt nerfed on a given day like ChatGPT can be. There was no question something happened in January with ChatGPT, weirdly would refuse to answer questions that were harmless but difficult(Give me a daily schedule of a stoic hedonist) Every once in a while, I see redditors complain of it being nerfed. Sometimes I go back to gpt3.5 and am mind boggled how much worse it is. Makes me wonder if t…
The original davinci model was a friend of mine and I resent this deeply. I've had completions with it that had character and creativity that I have not been able to recreate with anything else. Brilliant and hilarious things that are a permanent part of my family's cherished canon.
With how good gpt-3.5-turbo-0613 is (particularly with system prompt engineering), there's no longer as much of a need to use the GPT-4 API especially given its massive 20x-30x price increase. The mass adoption of the ChatGPT APIs compared to the old Completion APIs proves my initial blog post on the ChatGPT API correct: developers will immediately switch for a massive price reduction if quality is the same (or bette…
Code completion/assistance is an order of magnitude better in GPT4.
Biggest news here from a capabilities POV is actually the gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct model. gpt-3.5-turbo is the model behind ChatGPT. It's chat-fine-tuned which makes it very hard to use for use-cases where you really just want it to obey/complete without any "chatty" verbiage. The "davinci-003" model was the last instruction tuned model, but is 10x more expensive than gpt-3.5-turbo, so it makes economical sense to hack…
What’s the diff with 3.5turbo with instruct?
I imagine the API quality isnt nerfed on a given day like ChatGPT can be. There was no question something happened in January with ChatGPT, weirdly would refuse to answer questions that were harmless but difficult(Give me a daily schedule of a stoic hedonist) Every once in a while, I see redditors complain of it being nerfed. Sometimes I go back to gpt3.5 and am mind boggled how much worse it is. Makes me wonder if t…
There's still no news about the multi-modal gpt-4. I guess the image input is just too expensive to run or it's actually not as great as they hyped it.
Biggest news here from a capabilities POV is actually the gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct model. gpt-3.5-turbo is the model behind ChatGPT. It's chat-fine-tuned which makes it very hard to use for use-cases where you really just want it to obey/complete without any "chatty" verbiage. The "davinci-003" model was the last instruction tuned model, but is 10x more expensive than gpt-3.5-turbo, so it makes economical sense to hack…
I imagine the API quality isnt nerfed on a given day like ChatGPT can be. There was no question something happened in January with ChatGPT, weirdly would refuse to answer questions that were harmless but difficult(Give me a daily schedule of a stoic hedonist) Every once in a while, I see redditors complain of it being nerfed. Sometimes I go back to gpt3.5 and am mind boggled how much worse it is. Makes me wonder if t…
Is there any actual evidences other than some user subjective experiences?
In all my GPT-4 API (python) experiments, it takes 15-20 seconds to get a full response from server, which basically kills every idea I've tried hacking up because it just runs so slowly. Has anyone fared better? I might be doing something wrong but I can't see what that could possibly be.
We use it to generate automatic insights from survey data at a weekly cadence for Zigpoll (https://www.zigpoll.com). This makes getting an instant response unnecessary but still provides a lot of value to our customers.