How far do we think this product is from something that use uses langchain to parse pdfs, create & store chunks / embeddings, and feed them to ChatGPT (or a local model)? Do we think there's any secret sauce?
ScholarTurbo: Use ChatGPT to chat with PDFs (supports GPT-4)
51–60 of 70 posts
Re: ScholarTurbo: Use ChatGPT to chat with PDFs (supports GPT-4)
#52How far do we think this product is from something that use uses langchain to parse pdfs, create & store chunks / embeddings, and feed them to ChatGPT (or a local model)? Do we think there's any secret sauce?
I also don't use Langchain.
Re: ScholarTurbo: Use ChatGPT to chat with PDFs (supports GPT-4)
#53There will be a lot these quick to build interesting utilities to show off. There is room to feed the demand in wordpress sites and ad-word based websites.
I think OpenAI will keep the platform cheap long enough to collect the small toll and make the innovation go wild.
There is perhaps room for one more OpenAI style provider, like what Android did to iOS to feed this demand. It is a pity if its not Google.
Re: ScholarTurbo: Use ChatGPT to chat with PDFs (supports GPT-4)
#54I‘ve tried a lot of chat-with-pdf apps, including ChatDOC, ChatPDF, Humata and others. For serious paper reading, I must say that ChatDOC(https://chatdoc.com/) is the best option.
The accuracy of ChatDOC’s understanding of tables, data, and texts is significantly higher than other products. Also you can upload a folder of files and chat with the collection, easily navigating through each one.
For example: https://chatdoc.com/chatdoc/#/share/ub8Z7aarcXJHY_SzGwl3LFVw...
I uploaded a paper about GPT and asked ChatDOC to summarize the main content, explain the experimental data, and find relevant data. It completed all these tasks very well. Amazing.
Re: ScholarTurbo: Use ChatGPT to chat with PDFs (supports GPT-4)
#55The core is open source (https://github.com/jiggy-ai)
Re: ScholarTurbo: Use ChatGPT to chat with PDFs (supports GPT-4)
#56How do we know ChatGPT isn't hallucinating parts of its answers? I think this is an interesting service but what are the guardrails so we can trust the answer?
That's the problem, we don't. All the tools on top of GPT that I tried has the same problem.
Re: ScholarTurbo: Use ChatGPT to chat with PDFs (supports GPT-4)
#57I want to try this, but it's stuck at processing, showing 100% but not usable. I‘ve tried a lot of chat-with-pdf apps, including ChatDOC, ChatPDF, Humata and others. For serious paper reading, I must say that ChatDOC( https://chatdoc.com/ ) is the best option. The accuracy of ChatDOC’s understanding of tables, data, and texts is significantly higher than other products. Also you can upload a folder of files and chat…
Re: ScholarTurbo: Use ChatGPT to chat with PDFs (supports GPT-4)
#58This is similar to wordpress websites or android apps. Iphone store had a high toll bar, $99/year . There will be a lot these quick to build interesting utilities to show off. There is room to feed the demand in wordpress sites and ad-word based websites. I think OpenAI will keep the platform cheap long enough to collect the small toll and make the innovation go wild. There is perhaps room for one more OpenAI style p…
Re: ScholarTurbo: Use ChatGPT to chat with PDFs (supports GPT-4)
#59I want to try this, but it's stuck at processing, showing 100% but not usable. I‘ve tried a lot of chat-with-pdf apps, including ChatDOC, ChatPDF, Humata and others. For serious paper reading, I must say that ChatDOC( https://chatdoc.com/ ) is the best option. The accuracy of ChatDOC’s understanding of tables, data, and texts is significantly higher than other products. Also you can upload a folder of files and chat…
Re: ScholarTurbo: Use ChatGPT to chat with PDFs (supports GPT-4)
#60In answer to file security: "We utilize Amazon Web Services (AWS) for uploading and storing files, ensuring robust security measures, including data encryption and access control." Well, sure, but that's the file at rest. What about the security / privacy of the data as it's fed to ChatGPT? More and more of these "ask your doc / data a question" apps are popping up. Isn't this about equivalent to putting the document…
There appears to be a lot of apathy/total disregard to giving users any clear clue.
It might not matter to me or this audience - we probably know the direction our data is heading - but it matters to less techie people, to ordinary employees and to civil servants and government people at the bottom and the top, who have no notion where their data is processed and who they are trusting with it.