51–60 of 252 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which works perfectly fine until someone leaks the fact that NSA have full access to those documents, and occasionally will provide help to a few US companies that are seen as important to the nation.
Do you have any example of your claim about providing help?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you have any example of your claim about providing help?
This has been valid even decades before internet took over the world, I recall quite a few articles listed well known cases some years ago. Sure it wont push for some small startup but big corporations, sales of commercial planes, military equipment contracts and similar stuff for billions and more? CIA/NSA would be failing at its core real mission if they didnt help US interests when they see an opportunity. And wit…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some even upload all their conversations and confidential internal documents to Microsoft 365!
And to Google and Amazon and GitHub and Slack and 100 other SaaSs. Not sure why openai is supposed to be more of a concern.
The market is definitely there for enterprise LLMs. Everyone is using GPT for work. I use it to provide stubs for memos and to brainstorm - but the real value comes from replace internal “tribal knowledge” with an AI who knows your org in and out.
So employees share their knowledge to get replaced by an AI?
(it makes it easier for some junior to replace you some day)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some even upload all their conversations and confidential internal documents to Microsoft 365!
Some people upload their entire private lives, personal and family photos to iCloud. Several celebrities were target of iCloud leaks and their nudes ended up into 'the fappening'. Microsoft so far hasn't been hacked.
How do you know?
Funnily enough our company will start to roll out an internal ChatGPT UI with an agreement with Azure on not to use the data for training etc, where we would be allowed to share internal data.
Can they enforce code injections to create backdoors, like they tried with cryptography?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So employees share their knowledge to get replaced by an AI?
one could argue that sharing knowledge was not exactly in employee interest even before AI. (it makes it easier for some junior to replace you some day)
And the junior could leave the company, an AI won't.
Of course there is a duty on employees to be professional - the latter will be the ones taking up opportunities at non-legacy/dinosaur corporations that think they can command the waves.
The answer is to sort your processes, security and training out - new AI is here to stay, and managers cannot stop employees using game-changing tools without looking very foolish and incompetent.
The market is definitely there for enterprise LLMs. Everyone is using GPT for work. I use it to provide stubs for memos and to brainstorm - but the real value comes from replace internal “tribal knowledge” with an AI who knows your org in and out.