Earlier quoted context omitted.
How fucking lame, especially for a company that drug tests.
Why do you immediately jump to drugs as a conclusion? Maybe they just want to commemorate the birthday of the visionary leader who recognized and funded the genius inventor that ultimately ended up being instrumental in getting the American space program of the ground? /s
SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch
51–60 of 189 posts
Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gwynne Shotwell has said that SpaceX is a rocket factory company, not a rocket company. I agree entirely, the possibilities here make me so excited.
I understand the distinction but I wonder if it’s only useful because of the weird nature of previous rocket engineering efforts. Notably, NASA contracting out different components due to the quirks of being a government entity. SpaceX is much different than that but aren’t they rather similar to, say, car companies? I mean if SpaceX is a rocket factory company, isn’t Ford a car factory company? We just don’t include…
Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch
#53Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch
#54Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch
#55Press releases from SpaceX have alluded to a possible launch date of 420, which I think would be hilariously on brand.
Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
How fucking lame, especially for a company that drug tests.
Putting a rocket into orbit requires a good understanding of science and reality. There is no actual scientific proof that occasionally using marijuana is a bad thing that would make a potential employee a bad employee. Maybe politicians don't like that reality, but they are not the ones putting people into orbit.
It seems antiquated.
Edit: as cannabis use is transitioning to decriminalized, testing specifically for that will become antiquated. Standing crimes of course will remain leverage for bad guys.
Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gwynne Shotwell has said that SpaceX is a rocket factory company, not a rocket company. I agree entirely, the possibilities here make me so excited.
I understand the distinction but I wonder if it’s only useful because of the weird nature of previous rocket engineering efforts. Notably, NASA contracting out different components due to the quirks of being a government entity. SpaceX is much different than that but aren’t they rather similar to, say, car companies? I mean if SpaceX is a rocket factory company, isn’t Ford a car factory company? We just don’t include…
Before that, you had to have a weird german guy hand build your buggy.
Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gwynne Shotwell has said that SpaceX is a rocket factory company, not a rocket company. I agree entirely, the possibilities here make me so excited.
I understand the distinction but I wonder if it’s only useful because of the weird nature of previous rocket engineering efforts. Notably, NASA contracting out different components due to the quirks of being a government entity. SpaceX is much different than that but aren’t they rather similar to, say, car companies? I mean if SpaceX is a rocket factory company, isn’t Ford a car factory company? We just don’t include…
Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Putting a rocket into orbit requires a good understanding of science and reality. There is no actual scientific proof that occasionally using marijuana is a bad thing that would make a potential employee a bad employee. Maybe politicians don't like that reality, but they are not the ones putting people into orbit.
The traditional explanation is that drug users can be blackmailed and security compromised by adversaries threatening to reveal federally prohibited behavior. It seems antiquated. Edit: as cannabis use is transitioning to decriminalized, testing specifically for that will become antiquated. Standing crimes of course will remain leverage for bad guys.
Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Putting a rocket into orbit requires a good understanding of science and reality. There is no actual scientific proof that occasionally using marijuana is a bad thing that would make a potential employee a bad employee. Maybe politicians don't like that reality, but they are not the ones putting people into orbit.
To be clear, you think they are worse at building and launching rockets because they drug test employees? That seems like a stretch.