Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gitlab has "merge requests" the comment you're replying was trying to point out an error in an annoying way
i tried to add a lil laughing emoji to indicate that my comment was in jest but apparently those get stripped out of comments? my bad.
GitHub Actions Incident 29.3
51–56 of 56 posts
Re: GitHub Actions Incident 29.3
#52Funnily enough, GitLab is also melting down at the moment, with pipelines not running and pull requests not functioning: https://status.gitlab.com/
Re: GitHub Actions Incident 29.3
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gittea is great but it doesn't replace GHA, only the rest of GitHub.
They've actually just rolled out an early version of Gitea Actions in the most recent release, which are mostly compatible with GitHub actions. https://blog.gitea.io/2023/03/gitea-1.19.0-is-released/#-git...
Re: GitHub Actions Incident 29.3
#54what is the "29.3" in the title supposed to represent? is that supposed to indicate a date of March 29th? I do not see a reference to this on the incident page itself.
Re: GitHub Actions Incident 29.3
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gittea is great but it doesn't replace GHA, only the rest of GitHub.
They've actually just rolled out an early version of Gitea Actions in the most recent release, which are mostly compatible with GitHub actions. https://blog.gitea.io/2023/03/gitea-1.19.0-is-released/#-git...
Re: GitHub Actions Incident 29.3
#56what is the "29.3" in the title supposed to represent? is that supposed to indicate a date of March 29th? I do not see a reference to this on the incident page itself.
It is because titles will be duplicated on search if 29.3 is not added
I'm just jumping up and down how awful this representation is. iso8601 (YYYY-MM-DD) is a settled debate at this point.