Live data from Hacker News

Wavelength

daringfireball.net

51–60 of 151 posts

Re: Wavelength

#52

I know that this isn't the point of the article: > “something like Twitter but with real names and enforced civility, and with hashtags as Slack-like channels of interest.” but why is having real names on a chat app a good thing? Considering what's happening worldwide, anonymity online should always come first.

I guess there is something to be said about your speech having intended consequences (ie, preventing attacks/vitriol), but unintended consequences...

Arguably everything is E2E encrypted but that won't prevent someone in the discussion from taking a screenshot (thus removing context) and tweeting it, will it?

Re: Wavelength

#54
post #53

It's a forum. On a mobile device. And called a messaging app. But it's a forum.

Not sure what your point is, but even if on some level they accomplish the same thing (exchanging messages on a specific topic) they are very different things (slow/fast, public/private).

This is an encrypted chat app where group chats are the main focus.

Re: Wavelength

#55
> Messages on Wavelength are completely private and secure, using state of the art end-to-end encryption.

All of the state of the art end-to-end encryption in products I know of is free software.

Much more difficult to verify these claims otherwise.

Furthermore, the app privacy label on the App Store claims that this service collects your contacts. So much for privacy, then.

Any conversation that includes OpenAI's GPT also necessarily can't be "completely private" or end to end encrypted as the service must have a plaintext of the messages to proxy them (in cleartext from their view) to their OpenAI APIs. It also then, you know, uploads your messages to OpenAI.

What's the point of e2ee messaging if the service provider and OpenAI can read it all the moment you loop in the headline feature (GPT in your groupchat)?

Ultimately, threaded e2ee groupchat is a feature (ideally a feature added to Signal), not an app/company.

Re: Wavelength

#57
post #52

I know that this isn't the point of the article: > “something like Twitter but with real names and enforced civility, and with hashtags as Slack-like channels of interest.” but why is having real names on a chat app a good thing? Considering what's happening worldwide, anonymity online should always come first.

I guess there is something to be said about your speech having intended consequences (ie, preventing attacks/vitriol), but unintended consequences... Arguably everything is E2E encrypted but that won't prevent someone in the discussion from taking a screenshot (thus removing context) and tweeting it, will it?

Sure, but also chat software usually makes group chats possible, and with some (eg. telegram) you have groups with 100k+ people there.

Considering the amount of politically-incorrect, politically-sensitive etc. stuff (ukraine-russia war, anti government protests, recently anti-covid protests, basic software/... piracy, ...), having anonimity is a huge feature.

Re: Wavelength

#58

so I have to use slack at work, and my social interactions with friends, family and acquaintances are split across fb messenger, telegram, slack, discord, skype, WhatsApp, google chat, SMS, twitter dms and probably a few more I'm forgetting. on some of those platforms, I talk to as little as 1 single person. I don't understand what could possibly drive anyone to making a new messaging app at this point. Even if your…

When the only friend you talk to on platform A moves to platform B, then you will move to platform B. You've already shown that you're OK having your chat spread across the services, so while it may be annoying to you, it doesn't seem like a show stopper for a new platform.

Re: Wavelength

#59
post #54
post #53

It's a forum. On a mobile device. And called a messaging app. But it's a forum.

Not sure what your point is, but even if on some level they accomplish the same thing (exchanging messages on a specific topic) they are very different things (slow/fast, public/private). This is an encrypted chat app where group chats are the main focus.

The tree of: Groups > Threads > Messages is a forum.

Forums have had private forums, public forums, paid forums, encrypted, shared, only trusted device networks, for everyone, federated.

My point is that this isn't new, and that's a good thing.

It resonates, "it clicked", because it's something we recognise.

When we recognise something then we can also tap into the deep history and learn from the possibilities of that and also reflect on how they failed at times (against social media).

I love forums, I would love to see forums become the predominant form of messaging again. Forums yield slower and richer conversations between groups as small as a few people or as large as hundreds of thousands.

Calling it what it is helps access the past and peer into the future.

Re: Wavelength

#60

[flagged]

/sigh…

How is being forced to be civil so outrageous that it’s worth even mentioning?

The fixation on unmoderated freedom of speech is… obsessive. If they make a nice community for people who wanna talk to each other on those terms, good for them. Maybe it’s nice. Maybe it’s a heavily moderated echo chamber. Maybe it’s not for you, that’s fine.

What do you get by standing on the sidelines going “that’s abhorrent! Dear god nooooooooo…”?

It’s weird. You’re being weird. Chill out. Live and let be…

It’s ok to build this kind of stuff. It’s… so, utterly, utterly uncontroversial. Who cares?

Post reply on HN