Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see comments like this and I wonder what do people actually learn in school. Adam Smith wrote extensively about this (surely people still learn about him). His premise were people are naturally greedy, and it is good to use a system that pits their greed against each other. A natural competition to provide goods and services to each other. And it has worked well for hundreds of years, pulling billions out of povert…
The problem with that naive viewpoint is that it assumes that greedy people that got successful playing the game won't use their power to mess with the rules. Once the first set of greedy people gets powerful enough, they change the playing field and cement their lead. 75% of those billions pulled out of poverty were in China [0], which is explicitly not capitalist. [0] https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release…
Capitalism and democracy are older than the PRC, and the billions aided by it include the entire modern western world.